Re: ws2_32: Use WSAWaitForMultipleEvents instead of WaitForSingleObject

[Dmitry Timoshkov]

"Kai Blin" <kai.blin(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> -    HANDLE hEvent = INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE;
> +    WSAEVENT event_array[1];

Is that change only to avoid passing &hEvent to WSAWaitForMultipleEvents?

-- 
Dmitry.

ws2_32: Use WSAWaitForMultipleEvents instead of WaitForSingleObject

[Kai Blin]

On Monday 28 April 2008 13:39:38 Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
> "Kai Blin" <kai.blin(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > -    HANDLE hEvent = INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE;
> > +    WSAEVENT event_array[1];
>
> Is that change only to avoid passing &hEvent to WSAWaitForMultipleEvents?

Nope. WSAWaitForMultipleEvents expects an array of WSAEVENTs. So this seemed 
like the cleaner approach to do this.

Cheers,
Kai

-- 
Kai Blin
WorldForge developer  http://www.worldforge.org/
Wine developer        http://wiki.winehq.org/KaiBlin
Samba team member     http://www.samba.org/samba/team/
--
Will code for cotton.

ws2_32: Use WSAWaitForMultipleEvents instead ofWaitForSingleObject

[Dmitry Timoshkov]

"Kai Blin" <kai.blin(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > > -    HANDLE hEvent = INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE;
> > > +    WSAEVENT event_array[1];
> >
> > Is that change only to avoid passing &hEvent to WSAWaitForMultipleEvents?
>
> Nope. WSAWaitForMultipleEvents expects an array of WSAEVENTs. So this seemed 
> like the cleaner approach to do this.

That's exactly what I pointed out above. In C both ways is an equivalent.

-- 
Dmitry.