Re: msvcp90/tests: Don't redefine __thiscall (resend).

[Alexandre Julliard]

Nicolas Le Cam <niko.lecam(a)gmail.com> writes:
> @@ -60,11 +60,13 @@ static char* (__cdecl *p_Copy_s)(char*, size_t, const char*, size_t);
>  static unsigned short (__cdecl *p_wctype)(const char*);
>  static MSVCP__Ctypevec (__cdecl *p__Getctype)(void);
>
> +#ifndef __thiscall
>  #ifdef __i386__
>  #define __thiscall __stdcall
>  #else
>  #define __thiscall __cdecl
>  #endif
> +#endif

That seems dangerous, we don't know what it has been defined to.

-- 
Alexandre Julliard
julliard(a)winehq.org

msvcp90/tests: Don't redefine __thiscall (resend).

[Nicolas Le Cam]

Le 13 mars 2012 16:28, Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> a écrit :
> Nicolas Le Cam <niko.lecam(a)gmail.com> writes:
> > @@ -60,11 +60,13 @@ static char* (__cdecl *p_Copy_s)(char*, size_t, const char*, size_t);
> >  static unsigned short (__cdecl *p_wctype)(const char*);
> >  static MSVCP__Ctypevec (__cdecl *p__Getctype)(void);
> >
> > +#ifndef __thiscall
> >  #ifdef __i386__
> >  #define __thiscall __stdcall
> >  #else
> >  #define __thiscall __cdecl
> >  #endif
> > +#endif
>
> That seems dangerous, we don't know what it has been defined to.
>
> --
> Alexandre Julliard
> julliard(a)winehq.org

You're right. I'll undefine it then. Thanks.

-- 
Nicolas Le Cam