Re: [1/3] server: Add a process flag indicating whether the process is terminating, use it to block thread creation in a bei
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=25445 Your paranoid android. === W7PROX64 (64 bit loader) === loader.c:1638: Test failed: expected WAIT_OBJECT_0, got 0x102 loader.c:1648: Test failed: expected thread exit code 196, got 259 loader.c:1210: Test failed: expected thread exit code 196, got 259 loader.c:1220: Test failed: expected WAIT_ABANDONED, got 0x102 loader.c:1236: Test failed: expected WAIT_OBJECT_0, got 0x102
Marvin <testbot(a)testbot.winehq.org> wrote:
=== W7PROX64 (64 bit loader) === loader.c:1638: Test failed: expected WAIT_OBJECT_0, got 0x102 loader.c:1648: Test failed: expected thread exit code 196, got 259 loader.c:1210: Test failed: expected thread exit code 196, got 259 loader.c:1220: Test failed: expected WAIT_ABANDONED, got 0x102 loader.c:1236: Test failed: expected WAIT_OBJECT_0, got 0x102
Something is broken in that VM, the patch doesn't change anything in the test except removing a todo_wine. And patch [2/3] passes without failures: https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=25446 -- Dmitry.
participants (2)
-
Dmitry Timoshkov -
Marvin