Re: kernel32: Stubs for GetLogicalProcessorInformation(Ex) (resent)

[Alexandre Julliard]

Paul Chitescu <paulc(a)voip.null.ro> writes:
> @@ -3323,6 +3323,26 @@ HANDLE WINAPI GetCurrentProcess(void)
>  }
>
> /***********************************************************************
> + *           GetLogicalProcessorInformation     (KERNEL32.@)
> + */
> +BOOL WINAPI GetLogicalProcessorInformation(void *buffer, PDWORD pBufLen)

That's not the correct prototype.

-- 
Alexandre Julliard
julliard(a)winehq.org

kernel32: Stubs for GetLogicalProcessorInformation(Ex) (resent)

[Paul Chitescu]

On Monday 19 July 2010 03:25:15 pm Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Paul Chitescu <paulc(a)voip.null.ro> writes:
> > @@ -3323,6 +3323,26 @@ HANDLE WINAPI GetCurrentProcess(void)
> >  }
> >
> > /***********************************************************************
> > + *           GetLogicalProcessorInformation     (KERNEL32.@)
> > + */
> > +BOOL WINAPI GetLogicalProcessorInformation(void *buffer, PDWORD pBufLen)
>
> That's not the correct prototype.
>
> -- 
> Alexandre Julliard
> julliard(a)winehq.org

The "buffer" argument is not to void but the corresponding structures and 
constants are missing in wine includes.

Would you want first to have that structures copied from MSDN?

Paul

kernel32: Stubs for GetLogicalProcessorInformation(Ex) (resent)

[Alexandre Julliard]

Paul Chitescu <paulc(a)voip.null.ro> writes:
> The "buffer" argument is not to void but the corresponding structures and 
> constants are missing in wine includes.
>
> Would you want first to have that structures copied from MSDN?

Yes, of course you need to define them. You also need to add the
function prototype to the appropriate header.

-- 
Alexandre Julliard
julliard(a)winehq.org