Re: [PATCH 1/3] ws2_32: Implement a basic synchronous TransmitFile (try 5).

[Marvin]

Hi,

While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=17393

Your paranoid android.


=== w7pro64 (32 bit sock) ===
sock.c:7350: Test failed: bytesReturned isn't supposed to be 1
sock.c:7374: Test failed: GetOverlappedResult failed, error 0

[PATCH 1/3] ws2_32: Implement a basic synchronous TransmitFile (try 5).

[Bruno Jesus]

On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Marvin <testbot(a)winehq.org> wrote:
> === w7pro64 (32 bit sock) ===
> sock.c:7350: Test failed: bytesReturned isn't supposed to be 1
> sock.c:7374: Test failed: GetOverlappedResult failed, error 0

I'm trying to get rid of this random failures but I have had no luck so far.

[PATCH 1/3] ws2_32: Implement a basic synchronous TransmitFile (try 5).

[Erich E. Hoover]

On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 10:53 PM, Bruno Jesus <00cpxxx(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Marvin <testbot(a)winehq.org> wrote:
> > === w7pro64 (32 bit sock) ===
> > sock.c:7350: Test failed: bytesReturned isn't supposed to be 1
> > sock.c:7374: Test failed: GetOverlappedResult failed, error 0
>
> I'm trying to get rid of this random failures but I have had no luck so far.

I remember looking over the tests a number of years ago and wondering
about whether using localhost:0 is a problem for our tests.  Is it
possible that we're getting an open random port but that some other
program on the system sends data to that port?

Best,
Erich