Re: gdi32: Add a buch of CreateScalableFontResource() tests. Resend.
Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)baikal.ru> writes:
+ +/* @makedep: wine_test.ttf */ +wine_test.ttf RCDATA wine_test.ttf
How was this file created? -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org
Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> wrote:
+ +/* @makedep: wine_test.ttf */ +wine_test.ttf RCDATA wine_test.ttf
How was this file created?
It was created with fontforge. Here it is in a .sfd format just in case. -- Dmitry.
Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)baikal.ru> wrote:
Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> wrote:
+ +/* @makedep: wine_test.ttf */ +wine_test.ttf RCDATA wine_test.ttf
How was this file created?
It was created with fontforge. Here it is in a .sfd format just in case.
Is there anything else that prevents accepting this test case? -- Dmitry.
Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)baikal.ru> wrote:
Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)baikal.ru> wrote:
Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> wrote:
+ +/* @makedep: wine_test.ttf */ +wine_test.ttf RCDATA wine_test.ttf
How was this file created?
It was created with fontforge. Here it is in a .sfd format just in case.
Is there anything else that prevents accepting this test case?
Can I get a feedback on this please? -- Dmitry.
Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)baikal.ru> wrote:
Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> wrote:
+ +/* @makedep: wine_test.ttf */ +wine_test.ttf RCDATA wine_test.ttf
How was this file created?
It was created with fontforge. Here it is in a .sfd format just in case.
Is there anything else that prevents accepting this test case?
It's pretty disappointing to see no any reaction except the (answered) question above in a month. -- Dmitry.
On 08/24/2011 03:42 AM, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
It's pretty disappointing to see no any reaction except the (answered) question above in a month.
Do you know AJ has been on vacation for two weeks ? That you're not the only developer ? That AJ has tons of patch to read and comment ? You should at least resend it or ask that @ #winehackers And don't be disappointed, life's disappointing but whining won't change anything.
GOUJON Alexandre <ale.goujon(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 08/24/2011 03:42 AM, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
It's pretty disappointing to see no any reaction except the (answered) question above in a month.
Do you know AJ has been on vacation for two weeks ? That you're not the only developer ? That AJ has tons of patch to read and comment ?
That doesn't explain why the test case (!) sent one month ago has not been accepted and has stalled in the pending state while many other patches have been committed before and after the two weeks vacation time. I'd guess that's because my mailing address no more ends with @codeweavers.com but that's a pure speculation on my part. Nevertheless that doesn't look very nice.
You should at least resend it or ask that @ #winehackers
If you would read the subject you'd notice that it's already a resend. Besides how asking on wine-devel (several times already) does make a boost in comparison to asking on irc?
And don't be disappointed, life's disappointing but whining won't change anything.
Thank you very much for the useless comment on a public ml. -- Dmitry.
On 08/24/2011 07:16 AM, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
That doesn't explain why the test case (!) sent one month ago has not been accepted and has stalled in the pending state while many other patches have been committed before and after the two weeks vacation time. I'd guess that's because my mailing address no more ends with @codeweavers.com but that's a pure speculation on my part. Nevertheless that doesn't look very nice. Is there any anger in these words ?
If you would read the subject you'd notice that it's already a resend. Besides how asking on wine-devel (several times already) does make a boost in comparison to asking on irc? I never said it make a boost. I just know people don't have to reply now so asking multiple times may help.
Thank you very much for the useless comment on a public ml. Your comment is as useless as mine. But my comment still apply, whining don't help.
Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)baikal.ru> writes:
Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)baikal.ru> wrote:
Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> wrote:
+ +/* @makedep: wine_test.ttf */ +wine_test.ttf RCDATA wine_test.ttf
How was this file created?
It was created with fontforge. Here it is in a .sfd format just in case.
Is there anything else that prevents accepting this test case?
It's pretty disappointing to see no any reaction except the (answered) question above in a month.
The font would have to be generated from the .sfd. A better approach is probably to create it on the fly, possibly using an existing font as a template. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org
Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> wrote:
The font would have to be generated from the .sfd.
Is that because it's in a binary form? .sfd is just another font storage format, it's not the "source" by any means, nor it makes editing the file any easier.
A better approach is probably to create it on the fly, possibly using an existing font as a template.
I'd prefer to have a dedicated file for the tests, that way it would be a lot easier to add and test various ttf tables, font metrics, glyph rendering or outline layout. -- Dmitry.
Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)baikal.ru> writes:
Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> wrote:
The font would have to be generated from the .sfd.
Is that because it's in a binary form? .sfd is just another font storage format, it's not the "source" by any means, nor it makes editing the file any easier.
It makes the diffs readable. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org
participants (3)
-
Alexandre Julliard -
Dmitry Timoshkov -
GOUJON Alexandre