Re: [PATCH 2/2] winmm/tests: Test some inconsistent WAVEFORMAT descriptions.

[Marvin]

Hi,

While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=16276

Your paranoid android.


=== WVISTAADM (32 bit wave) ===
wave.c:658: Test failed: waveOutOpen(0): format=22050x 8x1 flags=50000(CALLBACK_EVENT) rc=MMSYSERR_INVALPARAM(An invalid parameter was passed to a system function.)
wave.c:658: Test failed: waveOutOpen(WAVE_MAPPER): format=22050x 8x1 flags=50000(CALLBACK_EVENT) rc=WAVERR_BADFORMAT(The specified format is not supported or cannot be translated.  Use the Capabilities function to determine the supported formats.)

=== W2K8SE (32 bit wave) ===
wave.c:658: Test failed: waveOutOpen(0): format=22050x 8x1 flags=50000(CALLBACK_EVENT) rc=MMSYSERR_INVALPARAM(An invalid parameter was passed to a system function.)
wave.c:658: Test failed: waveOutOpen(WAVE_MAPPER): format=22050x 8x1 flags=50000(CALLBACK_EVENT) rc=WAVERR_BADFORMAT(The specified format is not supported or cannot be translated.  Use the Capabilities function to determine the supported formats.)

=== W7PRO (32 bit wave) ===
wave.c:658: Test failed: waveOutOpen(0): format=22050x 8x1 flags=50000(CALLBACK_EVENT) rc=MMSYSERR_INVALPARAM(An invalid parameter was passed to a system function.)
wave.c:658: Test failed: waveOutOpen(WAVE_MAPPER): format=22050x 8x1 flags=50000(CALLBACK_EVENT) rc=WAVERR_BADFORMAT(The specified format is not supported or cannot be translated.  Use the Capabilities function to determine the supported formats.)

=== W7PROX64 (32 bit wave) ===
wave.c:658: Test failed: waveOutOpen(0): format=22050x 8x1 flags=50000(CALLBACK_EVENT) rc=MMSYSERR_INVALPARAM(An invalid parameter was passed to a system function.)
wave.c:658: Test failed: waveOutOpen(WAVE_MAPPER): format=22050x 8x1 flags=50000(CALLBACK_EVENT) rc=WAVERR_BADFORMAT(The specified format is not supported or cannot be translated.  Use the Capabilities function to determine the supported formats.)

=== TEST64_W7SP1 (32 bit wave) ===
wave.c:658: Test failed: waveOutOpen(0): format=22050x 8x1 flags=50000(CALLBACK_EVENT) rc=MMSYSERR_INVALPARAM(An invalid parameter was passed to a system function.)
wave.c:658: Test failed: waveOutOpen(WAVE_MAPPER): format=22050x 8x1 flags=50000(CALLBACK_EVENT) rc=WAVERR_BADFORMAT(The specified format is not supported or cannot be translated.  Use the Capabilities function to determine the supported formats.)

=== W7PROX64 (64 bit wave) ===
wave.c:658: Test failed: waveOutOpen(0): format=22050x 8x1 flags=50000(CALLBACK_EVENT) rc=MMSYSERR_INVALPARAM(An invalid parameter was passed to a system function.)
wave.c:658: Test failed: waveOutOpen(WAVE_MAPPER): format=22050x 8x1 flags=50000(CALLBACK_EVENT) rc=WAVERR_BADFORMAT(The specified format is not supported or cannot be translated.  Use the Capabilities function to determine the supported formats.)

=== TEST64_W7SP1 (64 bit wave) ===
wave.c:658: Test failed: waveOutOpen(0): format=22050x 8x1 flags=50000(CALLBACK_EVENT) rc=MMSYSERR_INVALPARAM(An invalid parameter was passed to a system function.)
wave.c:658: Test failed: waveOutOpen(WAVE_MAPPER): format=22050x 8x1 flags=50000(CALLBACK_EVENT) rc=WAVERR_BADFORMAT(The specified format is not supported or cannot be translated.  Use the Capabilities function to determine the supported formats.)

[PATCH 2/2] winmm/tests: Test some inconsistent WAVEFORMAT descriptions.

Hi,
> Your paranoid android.
> === WVISTA/W2K8/W7
> It's good that I kept the patch to code and tests separated.  The code one should go in,
> the tests obviously not (it's not easy to add a broken specific to that case in wave.c).
> They tell us that with the introduction of mmdevapi, MS incompatibly changed
> the code that checks the validity of WAVE_FORMAT_PCM.
> I argue that Wine ought to accept the bad blockalign formats, because w95/w98/w2k/wxp
> did render them (check with WINETEST_INTERACTIVE and listen) and some apps used that
> (that's why I started investigating this issue at all).
> Perhaps the nextp SP will bring compatibility to w7 too?

BTW, regarding
[PATCH 1/2] winealsa: Unify the checks for wBitsPerSample.
despite 1/2, it can be applied on its own, should you object 2/2. That why I split it.

Regards,
 Jörg Höhle