Re: Patch to fix bug 892

[Steven Edwards]

On 3/25/07, Patrick Baggett <baggett.patrick(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> There also was a problem with getting the number of processors. The old code
> assumed always 1 processor. The new code uses POSIX interfaces, if
> available, at compile time and correctly builds a bitmask of the active
> processors.

It seems to me this should really be detected at runtime.

-- 
Steven Edwards

"There is one thing stronger than all the armies in the world, and
that is an idea whose time has come." - Victor Hugo