Re: [PATCH] kernelbase: Add rudimentary mui resource support to loader.c
Thank you for informing me. On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 3:44 PM Marvin <testbot(a)winehq.org> wrote:
Thank you for your contribution to Wine!
This is an automated notification to let you know that your patch has been reviewed and its status set to "Rejected".
This means that the patch has been rejected by a reviewer. You should have received a mail explaining why it was rejected. You need to fix the issue and resend the patch, or if you are convinced that your patch is good as is, you should reply to the rejection message with your counterarguments.
If you do not understand the reason for this status, disagree with our assessment, or are simply not sure how to proceed next, please ask for clarification by replying to this email.
Dear Marvin, I did some further searching, looking for the explanation for the rejection, but I did not receive any other email. Also, I was connected to the #winehackers channel today and did not see any feedback there either. Can whoever reviewed my patch resend the reason for the rejection? Thank you. Regards, Craig On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 7:35 PM Craig Schulstad <craigaschulstad(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Thank you for informing me.
On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 3:44 PM Marvin <testbot(a)winehq.org> wrote:
Thank you for your contribution to Wine!
This is an automated notification to let you know that your patch has been reviewed and its status set to "Rejected".
This means that the patch has been rejected by a reviewer. You should have received a mail explaining why it was rejected. You need to fix the issue and resend the patch, or if you are convinced that your patch is good as is, you should reply to the rejection message with your counterarguments.
If you do not understand the reason for this status, disagree with our assessment, or are simply not sure how to proceed next, please ask for clarification by replying to this email.
participants (1)
-
Craig Schulstad