Hi folks, In my relentless quest for speed :), I discovered that we don't send a WM_STYLECHANGED message when we flip the WS_VISIBLE, or WS_VSCROLL, and maybe a bunch of others, I haven't checked. Shouldn't we send such a message, when we touch *any* WS_[EX_]* bits? -- Dimi.
"Dimitrie O. Paun" <dpaun(a)rogers.com> writes:
In my relentless quest for speed :), I discovered that we don't send a WM_STYLECHANGED message when we flip the WS_VISIBLE, or WS_VSCROLL, and maybe a bunch of others, I haven't checked.
Shouldn't we send such a message, when we touch *any* WS_[EX_]* bits?
Sometimes yes, sometimes no. The only way to know is to test that specific situation under Windows. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.com
On September 27, 2002 12:59 pm, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
"Dimitrie O. Paun" <dpaun(a)rogers.com> writes:
Shouldn't we send such a message, when we touch *any* WS_[EX_]* bits?
Sometimes yes, sometimes no. The only way to know is to test that specific situation under Windows.
[Note to self: I should find a way to test stuff on Windows] So my question to you: do you know for sure of any case when we change some of those bits, and we should not emit a notification? -- Dimi.
"Dimitrie O. Paun" <dpaun(a)rogers.com> writes:
So my question to you: do you know for sure of any case when we change some of those bits, and we should not emit a notification?
No, I haven't looked into it. That doesn't mean we should start sending notifications everywhere without checking what Windows does... -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.com
participants (2)
-
Alexandre Julliard -
Dimitrie O. Paun