Re: include: rename LIST_ENTRY to WINE_LIST_ENTRY to prevent a conflict on *BSD/OS X
15 Jan
2010
15 Jan
'10
11:17 p.m.
On 1/16/2010 02:12, Austin English wrote:
See bug 21320.
LIST_FOR_EACH_SAFE is inconsistent after your patch. Also I think a shorter variant something like WLIST_... is preferable, but it's a subject of discussion.
15 Jan
15 Jan
11:51 p.m.
New subject: include: rename LIST_ENTRY to WINE_LIST_ENTRY to prevent a conflict on *BSD/OS X
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 5:17 PM, Nikolay Sivov <bunglehead(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 1/16/2010 02:12, Austin English wrote:
See bug 21320.
LIST_FOR_EACH_SAFE is inconsistent after your patch.
It probably should, yeah, but that should be a separate patch. I'll resend as a series next week.
Also I think a shorter variant something like WLIST_... is preferable, but it's a subject of discussion.
Doesn't matter to me. -- -Austin
5900
Age (days ago)
5900
Last active (days ago)
1 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Austin English -
Nikolay Sivov