Re: riched20: add EM_EXSETSEL conformance tests and fixes bug 4462

[Matt Finnicum]

Hi,
Is there something wrong with this patch / a reason it's not being accepted?

Sorry if this might have been answered this on IRC last night - X died
while I was away, so I'd have missed it.

Thanks,
--Matt Finnicum

On 8/19/06, Matt Finnicum <mattfinn(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> I've cleaned up / re-diffed this patch from Brian Chang. It fixes bug
> 4462 by handling several odd ways in which EM_EXSETSEL can be called.
> It also make the message return a proper value, not just zero.
>
> --Matt Finnicum (Please commit as Brian Chang)
>
> The last version of this patch can be found here:
> http://www.winehq.com/pipermail/wine-patches/2006-March/024976.html
>
> ---
>  dlls/riched20/editor.c       |   25 +++++++++++++++++---
>  dlls/riched20/tests/editor.c |   52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

riched20: add EM_EXSETSEL conformance tests and fixes bug 4462

[Alexandre Julliard]

"Matt Finnicum" <mattfinn(a)gmail.com> writes:
> Hi,
> Is there something wrong with this patch / a reason it's not being accepted?
>
> Sorry if this might have been answered this on IRC last night - X died
> while I was away, so I'd have missed it.

When resending a patch, especially a patch by someone else, please
include the original Changelog, and the full name/email of the
original author, so that I don't have to go hunt them down. Thanks.

-- 
Alexandre Julliard
julliard(a)winehq.org