Re: [1/6] ntdll: refactor NTDLL_create_struct_sd and NTDLL_free_struct_sd so that other modules are able to use them
Joris van der Wel <joris(a)jorisvanderwel.com> writes:
ntdll: refactor NTDLL_create_struct_sd and NTDLL_free_struct_sd so that other modules are able to use them (extern). New names are wine_server_create_struct_sd and wine_server_free_struct_sd.
That's not used enough to warrant new private exports from ntdll. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org
So should I instead copy paste those 2 functions into kernel32 (with NTDLL renamed to KERNEL32)? On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 9:15 AM, Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> wrote:
Joris van der Wel <joris(a)jorisvanderwel.com> writes:
ntdll: refactor NTDLL_create_struct_sd and NTDLL_free_struct_sd so that other modules are able to use them (extern). New names are wine_server_create_struct_sd and wine_server_free_struct_sd.
That's not used enough to warrant new private exports from ntdll.
-- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org
Joris van der Wel <joris(a)jorisvanderwel.com> writes:
So should I instead copy paste those 2 functions into kernel32 (with NTDLL renamed to KERNEL32)?
Possibly, though there may be better ways to do that. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org
I dislike duplicating code... An alternative would be to put the entire function in a header file, I've seen examples of other functions that are placed in one, in wine. This would introduce around 70 lines to some .h file. Perhaps along with the other headers for the server protocol?, NTDLL_create_struct_sd is part of the client to server serialization after all... Or in a header of ntdll? What do you suggest? On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 12:13 PM, Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> wrote:
Joris van der Wel <joris(a)jorisvanderwel.com> writes:
So should I instead copy paste those 2 functions into kernel32 (with NTDLL renamed to KERNEL32)?
Possibly, though there may be better ways to do that.
-- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org
On 07/07/2014 03:38 PM, Joris van der Wel wrote:
I dislike duplicating code... An alternative would be to put the entire function in a header file, I've seen examples of other functions that are placed in one, in wine. This would introduce around 70 lines to some .h file. Perhaps along with the other headers for the server protocol?, NTDLL_create_struct_sd is part of the client to server serialization after all... Or in a header of ntdll?
What do you suggest? I hate duplicated code too but sometimes you gotta do what you gotta do... Duplicating code is considered the less ugly solution in Wine in a lot of situations.
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 12:13 PM, Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> wrote:
Joris van der Wel <joris(a)jorisvanderwel.com> writes:
So should I instead copy paste those 2 functions into kernel32 (with NTDLL renamed to KERNEL32)?
Possibly, though there may be better ways to do that.
bye michael
participants (3)
-
Alexandre Julliard -
Joris van der Wel -
Michael Stefaniuc