Re: mscoree [1/2]: Add missing stubs to the spec file
On Wed, 11 Oct 2006, James Hawkins wrote:
Hi,
Changelog: * Add missing stubs to the spec file.
dlls/mscoree/mscoree.spec | 125 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 files changed, 120 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
Interesting - what mscoree version are those ordinals from? I got mines from XP Home SP2. Paul Chitescu
On 10/11/06, Paul Chitescu <paulc(a)voip.null.ro> wrote:
On Wed, 11 Oct 2006, James Hawkins wrote:
Hi,
Changelog: * Add missing stubs to the spec file.
dlls/mscoree/mscoree.spec | 125 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 files changed, 120 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
Interesting - what mscoree version are those ordinals from? I got mines from XP Home SP2.
XP Professional SP2. I'm pretty sure your copy of mscoree.dll doesn't have just those exports. Send it to me off the list and I'll check it out. -- James Hawkins
On 10/11/06, James Hawkins <truiken(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 10/11/06, Paul Chitescu <paulc(a)voip.null.ro> wrote:
On Wed, 11 Oct 2006, James Hawkins wrote:
Hi,
Changelog: * Add missing stubs to the spec file.
dlls/mscoree/mscoree.spec | 125 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 files changed, 120 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
Interesting - what mscoree version are those ordinals from? I got mines from XP Home SP2.
XP Professional SP2. I'm pretty sure your copy of mscoree.dll doesn't have just those exports. Send it to me off the list and I'll check it out.
Ah ordinals, for this dll it's not a big deal because (probably) all apps get the export by name instead of ordinal. For the installers I've seen that's the case, and I can't imagine any app working on both Home and Professional if the ordinals are different and they call GetProcAddress with the ordinals. -- James Hawkins
"James Hawkins" <truiken(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Ah ordinals, for this dll it's not a big deal because (probably) all apps get the export by name instead of ordinal. For the installers I've seen that's the case, and I can't imagine any app working on both Home and Professional if the ordinals are different and they call GetProcAddress with the ordinals.
According to 'dumpbin /exports mscoree.lib' on a mscoree.lib from PSDK only a few exports really have an ordinal assigned: some C++ ones and ReOpenMetaDataWithMemory (23). -- Dmitry.
On 10/11/06, Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)codeweavers.com> wrote:
"James Hawkins" <truiken(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Ah ordinals, for this dll it's not a big deal because (probably) all apps get the export by name instead of ordinal. For the installers I've seen that's the case, and I can't imagine any app working on both Home and Professional if the ordinals are different and they call GetProcAddress with the ordinals.
According to 'dumpbin /exports mscoree.lib' on a mscoree.lib from PSDK only a few exports really have an ordinal assigned: some C++ ones and ReOpenMetaDataWithMemory (23).
Is this information available in our winedump? I've always been confused about when to use ordinals and whent to use the @ symbol. I also used depends and that just gave me the ordinals. -- James Hawkins
"James Hawkins" <truiken(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Is this information available in our winedump? I've always been confused about when to use ordinals and whent to use the @ symbol. I also used depends and that just gave me the ordinals.
No, winedump is not able to dump contents of COFF .lib files, and PE files don't provide information about real ordinal numbers. -- Dmitry.
"James Hawkins" <truiken(a)gmail.com> wrote:
"James Hawkins" <truiken(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Ah ordinals, for this dll it's not a big deal because (probably) all apps get the export by name instead of ordinal. For the installers I've seen that's the case, and I can't imagine any app working on both Home and Professional if the ordinals are different and they call GetProcAddress with the ordinals.
According to 'dumpbin /exports mscoree.lib' on a mscoree.lib from PSDK only a few exports really have an ordinal assigned: some C++ ones and ReOpenMetaDataWithMemory (23).
Is this information available in our winedump? I've always been confused about when to use ordinals and whent to use the @ symbol. I also used depends and that just gave me the ordinals.
I've sent a patch for winedump which adds a COFF library dumper functionality to it. It hasn't been committed due to some minor problems with it (missing auto-detection of a file format), but any interested person should be able to apply it and start a janitorial work of inspecting/fixing/synchronizing ordinal exports between Wine and Windows using information from the PSDK import libraries. -- Dmitry.
On 11/27/06, Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)codeweavers.com> wrote:
"James Hawkins" <truiken(a)gmail.com> wrote:
"James Hawkins" <truiken(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Ah ordinals, for this dll it's not a big deal because (probably) all apps get the export by name instead of ordinal. For the installers I've seen that's the case, and I can't imagine any app working on both Home and Professional if the ordinals are different and they call GetProcAddress with the ordinals.
According to 'dumpbin /exports mscoree.lib' on a mscoree.lib from PSDK only a few exports really have an ordinal assigned: some C++ ones and ReOpenMetaDataWithMemory (23).
Is this information available in our winedump? I've always been confused about when to use ordinals and whent to use the @ symbol. I also used depends and that just gave me the ordinals.
I've sent a patch for winedump which adds a COFF library dumper functionality to it. It hasn't been committed due to some minor problems with it (missing auto-detection of a file format), but any interested person should be able to apply it and start a janitorial work of inspecting/fixing/synchronizing ordinal exports between Wine and Windows using information from the PSDK import libraries.
Thanks for these patches Dmitry! I'll try it out. -- James Hawkins
participants (3)
-
Dmitry Timoshkov -
James Hawkins -
Paul Chitescu