Juan Lang <juan_lang(a)yahoo.com> writes:
@@ -2230,13 +2232,23 @@
sz = 14 + pisid->SubAuthorityCount * 11; str = LocalAlloc( 0, sz*sizeof(WCHAR) ); - sprintfW( str, fmt, pisid->Revision, - pisid->IdentifierAuthority.Value[2], - pisid->IdentifierAuthority.Value[3], - pisid->IdentifierAuthority.Value[0]&0x0f, - pisid->IdentifierAuthority.Value[4]&0x0f, - pisid->IdentifierAuthority.Value[1]&0x0f, - pisid->IdentifierAuthority.Value[5]&0x0f); + sprintfW( str, fmt, pisid->Revision ); + for( i=2; i<=3; i++ ) + { + if( pisid->IdentifierAuthority.Value[i] ) + printingIdent = TRUE; + if( printingIdent ) + sprintfW( str + lstrlenW( str ), identAuthFmt, + pisid->IdentifierAuthority.Value[i] ); + }
That doesn't look right, you'd need something like %02x for the second value if the first was printed. It seems it would be a lot easier to simply build an int from the various values and then format it with a single %x. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org
participants (1)
-
Alexandre Julliard