patchwatcher and changes to configure.h.in [was: re: ntdll/file: Add sub-second resolution to NtQueryInformationFile]

[Dan Kegel]

> > Btw, how does patchwatcher handle that?
> > Does it detect that in the case of changing config.h.in,
> > dlls/Makefile.in, server/protocol.def it needs
> > to regenerate the files by running autoconf,
> > tools/make_requests, or tools/make_makefiles?
>
> Not at all.

Patches gratefully accepted.

Status:
- posted note about two bugs in patch series handling, will fix tomorrow
- "time baseline_tests" doesn't work (limitation of time cmd),
need to fix borkage there.  Sloppy.
- Austin sent in a patch to install gecko
- I'm close to having valgrind integration, but haven't
looked at how to make it fast enough yet.
- user32:monitor.c:262: Test failed: Failed to reset default resolution
is happening lately; should probably restart X server between runs

patchwatcher and changes to configure.h.in [was: re: ntdll/file: Add sub-second resolution to NtQueryInformationFile]

[Kai Blin]

On Tuesday 19 August 2008 02:36:02 Dan Kegel wrote:
> > > Btw, how does patchwatcher handle that?
> > > Not at all.
>
> Patches gratefully accepted.

Whoops, I just realized this came across rather rude. Sorry for that. I'm 
currently trying to get the basic features of the patchwatcher to work in 
buildbot and know how hard this stuff is.

I'm actually glad for you pioneering in this area, allowing me to steal^Wuse 
ideas for integration into buildbot.

Cheers,
Kai

-- 
Kai Blin
WorldForge developer  http://www.worldforge.org/
Wine developer        http://wiki.winehq.org/KaiBlin
Samba team member     http://www.samba.org/samba/team/
--
Will code for cotton.

patchwatcher and changes to configure.h.in [was: re: ntdll/file: Add sub-second resolution to NtQueryInformationFile]

[Dan Kegel]

Kai wrote:
> > > > Btw, how does patchwatcher handle that?
> > > > Not at all.
>
> Whoops, I just realized this came across rather rude

Nah, that was fine.  (Although "it doesn't yet" might have been
clearer.)
> I'm currently trying to get the basic features of the
> patchwatcher to work in buildbot and know how hard this stuff is.

I was totally jazzed when I saw you were doing that.  Good luck!
> I'm actually glad for you pioneering in this area, allowing me to
> steal^Wuse ideas for integration into buildbot.

Yeah, I hope it's a useful prototype for you.
My gut feeling is that it might be a while before you catch up,
but I hope I'm wrong.
I'd love to see you pass me before I have to add support
for distributed build slaves to patchwatcher!
- Dan