[PATCH] winspool.drv: fake success in AddPrintProcessorA

[Vijay Kiran Kamuju]

Wine-Bug: https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26171
Signed-off-by: Vijay Kiran Kamuju <infyquest(a)gmail.com>

[Zebediah Figura]

Should this just call AddPrintProcessorW() instead?

[Vijay Kiran Kamuju]

On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 5:32 PM Zebediah Figura <z.figura12(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Should this just call AddPrintProcessorW() instead?

Yes, when have proper implementation of AddPrintProcessorW()

[Zebediah Figura]

On 4/10/20 10:47 AM, Vijay Kiran Kamuju wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 5:32 PM Zebediah Figura <z.figura12(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > Should this just call AddPrintProcessorW() instead?
>
> Yes, when have proper implementation of AddPrintProcessorW()

Any reason not to just do it now?

[Vijay Kiran Kamuju]

On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 5:49 PM Zebediah Figura <zfigura(a)codeweavers.com> wrote:
> On 4/10/20 10:47 AM, Vijay Kiran Kamuju wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 5:32 PM Zebediah Figura <z.figura12(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Should this just call AddPrintProcessorW() instead?
> >
> > Yes, when have proper implementation of AddPrintProcessorW()
>
> Any reason not to just do it now?

Currently its done to make the both AddPrintProcessorW and
AddPrintProcessorA return the same value and be in sync.
The calling W function from A function, has to be done with proper
checks and tests.
This can be done in later patches.