Re: [2/4] avifil32/tests: Initial-test-data-and-simple-test-for-avifil32-depends

[James McKenzie]

Julius Schwartzenberg wrote:
> These are resents of last week which are cleaned up more and with
> Detlef's patch on which they depend in front.
>
> While looking at avifile, I noticed some strange behaviour. Because
> some fixes may seem strange, I felt a test suite was really necessary
> to show that this is really what's happening on Windows. All the tests
> pass on both Windows 98 and Windows XP.

C++ type comments are not allowed.

Please mark second and subsequent submissions with [Try #]  in the
message header.  It keeps us from guessing which submission is the latest.

There is no requirement to submit subsequent parts of a patchset if
there are no changes to them if changes in prior sections do not affect
the code in them.

James McKenzie

[2/4] avifil32/tests: Initial-test-data-and-simple-test-for-avifil32-depends

[Julius Schwartzenberg]

James McKenzie wrote:
> C++ type comments are not allowed.

Of course, it was a stupid mistake of me. The whole comment wasn't 
relevant anymore.
> Please mark second and subsequent submissions with [Try #]  in the
> message header.  It keeps us from guessing which submission is the latest.
>
> There is no requirement to submit subsequent parts of a patchset if
> there are no changes to them if changes in prior sections do not affect
> the code in them.

Alright, I will mind this next time.

Thanks a lot to everybody for all the support! It's really nice to get 
so much feedback so quickly.
I will also add these notes to the wiki.

Regards,
Julius