Some statistics about the 1.0->1.2 development cycle

[Wolfram Sang]

Hello,

I am going to speak about my "getting into wine development" at FrosCon 
(near Bonn/Germany) next weekend. During preparation, I was interested 
in some numbers, so I roughly modified 'kps' (kernel patch statistics) 
for wine. The outcome for the 1.0->1.2 cycle can be found here, if 
somebody is interested (just make sure you read the README first):

http://www.the-dreams.de/wine/winekpsstats10-12.tar.gz

So far, not too surprising IMHO, although I probably missed a number of 
people. I am open for comments, if there are some.

Have a nice sunday,

    Wolfram

[Michael Stefaniuc]

Hello Wolfram,

On 08/15/2010 05:42 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> I am going to speak about my "getting into wine development" at FrosCon
> (near Bonn/Germany) next weekend. During preparation, I was interested
> in some numbers, so I roughly modified 'kps' (kernel patch statistics)
> for wine. The outcome for the 1.0->1.2 cycle can be found here, if
> somebody is interested (just make sure you read the README first):
>
> http://www.the-dreams.de/wine/winekpsstats10-12.tar.gz
>
> So far, not too surprising IMHO, although I probably missed a number of
> people. I am open for comments, if there are some.
> you'll have to reassign my patches to the "(None)" category. While I do 
> work for Red Hat I'm working there as a network engineer, not as a 
> developer. Wine is pure hobby for me and Red Hat doesn't pay me a cent 
> for that; even my trips to the WineConfs are payed out of my own pocket.

bye
	michael

[Marcus Meissner]

On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 07:13:12PM +0200, Michael Stefaniuc wrote:
> Hello Wolfram,
>
> On 08/15/2010 05:42 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > I am going to speak about my "getting into wine development" at FrosCon
> > (near Bonn/Germany) next weekend. During preparation, I was interested
> > in some numbers, so I roughly modified 'kps' (kernel patch statistics)
> > for wine. The outcome for the 1.0->1.2 cycle can be found here, if
> > somebody is interested (just make sure you read the README first):
> >
> > http://www.the-dreams.de/wine/winekpsstats10-12.tar.gz
> >
> > So far, not too surprising IMHO, although I probably missed a number of
> > people. I am open for comments, if there are some.
> > you'll have to reassign my patches to the "(None)" category. While I do 
> > work for Red Hat I'm working there as a network engineer, not as a 
> > developer. Wine is pure hobby for me and Red Hat doesn't pay me a cent for 
> > that; even my trips to the WineConfs are payed out of my own pocket.

Similar for me ... "marcus(a)jet.franken.de" is my private account and means
private work.

(The meissner(a)suse.de account is however for work I have done on SUSE time.) 

Ciao, Marcus

[Henri Verbeet]

On 15 August 2010 19:28, Marcus Meissner <marcus(a)jet.franken.de> wrote:
> Similar for me ... "marcus(a)jet.franken.de" is my private account and means
> private work.

Similar split for me, although the amount of patches from
hverbeet(a)gmail.com after 1.0 is probably trivial.

[Francois Gouget]

On Sun, 15 Aug 2010, Marcus Meissner wrote:
[...]
> Similar for me ... "marcus(a)jet.franken.de" is my private account and means
> private work.
>
> (The meissner(a)suse.de account is however for work I have done on SUSE time.)

Same split here: fgouget(a)codeweavers.com patches were for work and 
fgouget(a)free.fr are for personal stuff.

-- 
Francois Gouget <fgouget(a)free.fr>              http://fgouget.free.fr/
May your Tongue stick to the Roof of your Mouth with the Force of a Thousand Caramels.

[Wolfram Sang]

> you'll have to reassign my patches to the "(None)" category. While I do

Will do, of course. Also for all the other requests I get/got.
> for that; even my trips to the WineConfs are payed out of my own pocket.

Sounds familiar ;)

Regards,

    Wolfram

[GOUJON Alexandre]

Rather interesting , thanks !
But just for accuracy, I'm a frenchman.

[Wolfram Sang]

> But just for accuracy, I'm a frenchman.

Ah, now I remember what I wanted to add to the README :)
I did not change anything in the built-in country-detection which is 
still quite experimental, even upstream. Please just ignore it. I once 
thought about removing it, might do so later on.

Thanks,

    Wolfram