Re: ws2_32: Better trace setsockopt/getsockopt

[Bruno Jesus]

On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 12:49 AM, Bruno Jesus <00cpxxx(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> The intention of this patch is to make it easier to read winsock logs,
> for setsockopt it even displays the value if its size is less than 5
> bytes.

Hi, any complains about this patch? It's pending for 2 weeks now and I
think this is a good waiting time to ask.

Best Regards,
Bruno

ws2_32: Better trace setsockopt/getsockopt

[Alexandre Julliard]

Bruno Jesus <00cpxxx(a)gmail.com> writes:
> On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 12:49 AM, Bruno Jesus <00cpxxx(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > The intention of this patch is to make it easier to read winsock logs,
> > for setsockopt it even displays the value if its size is less than 5
> > bytes.
>
> Hi, any complains about this patch? It's pending for 2 weeks now and I
> think this is a good waiting time to ask.

You should be using wine_dbg_sprintf and the like.

-- 
Alexandre Julliard
julliard(a)winehq.org