Re: kernel32: CreateMemoryResourceNotification stub should return a waitable handle

[Dan Kegel]

On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 6:38 AM, Vitaliy Margolen
<wine-devel(a)kievinfo.com> wrote:
> > > > > +    return CreateEventA(NULL, FALSE, FALSE, "Fake
> > > > > MemoryResourceNotification");
> > > >
> > > > I don't think you want a named event here. Anonymous would be better, in
> > > > case the program will ask for another event.
> > >
> > > Oh, right.  Anonymous it is, then.
> >
> > Hang on - those events will never fire, so what does it matter if
> > the same event gets two handles?
>
> My bad. Was just trying to make sure it won't conflict with anything.
>
> Re-read description of this function on MSDN which indicates it's a system
> wide event. So you should be good with the named event.

Good, the patch stands then.
- Dan