Re: [2/2] include/vfw.h: Replace handmade COM method macros by widl generated ones (including inline wrappers).

[Nikolay Sivov]

I think the idea was to have a proper idl file eventually.

[2/2] include/vfw.h: Replace handmade COM method macros by widl generated ones (including inline wrappers).

[Dmitry Timoshkov]

Nikolay Sivov <bunglehead(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> I think the idea was to have a proper idl file eventually.

Amount of autogenerated code in that file is relatively small (actually
that's what I just have submitted) and it doesn't worth the trouble to
create an idl IMHO. Besides PSDK doesn't have it autogenerated either.

-- 
Dmitry.

[2/2] include/vfw.h: Replace handmade COM method macros by widl generated ones (including inline wrappers).

[Nikolay Sivov]

On 4/7/2014 11:32, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
> Nikolay Sivov <bunglehead(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > I think the idea was to have a proper idl file eventually.
> > Amount of autogenerated code in that file is relatively small (actually
> > that's what I just have submitted) and it doesn't worth the trouble to
> > create an idl IMHO. Besides PSDK doesn't have it autogenerated either.
> > The point is to make it autogenerated. I know that PSDK doesn't do that 
> > in many places, we don't necessary have to follow.

Actually, Henri, Stefan, what was decided for DirectX headers in that 
regard? Leave as it is, switch to idls eventually, something else?

[2/2] include/vfw.h: Replace handmade COM method macros by widl generated ones (including inline wrappers).

[Henri Verbeet]

On 7 April 2014 09:43, Nikolay Sivov <bunglehead(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Actually, Henri, Stefan, what was decided for DirectX headers in that
> regard? Leave as it is, switch to idls eventually, something else?

We'd like to generate them from IDL eventually, but I don't think
anyone is currently actively working on that.