Re: [PATCH 2/7] gdi: Implement BiDi classification of characters
Hi Maarten, Could you configure your git scripts to output different filenames when generating patches? Somehow they get managed for me in my gmail inbox. It makes it quite a pain for me to review. Thanks -- Steven Edwards "There is one thing stronger than all the armies in the world, and that is an idea whose time has come." - Victor Hugo
Steven Edwards schreef:
Hi Maarten,
Could you configure your git scripts to output different filenames when generating patches? Somehow they get managed for me in my gmail inbox. It makes it quite a pain for me to review.
Hi Steven, What kind of different filenames? .txt instead of .patch? Cheers, Maarten
On 9/15/07, Maarten Lankhorst <m.b.lankhorst(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Steven Edwards schreef:
Hi Maarten,
Could you configure your git scripts to output different filenames when generating patches? Somehow they get managed for me in my gmail inbox. It makes it quite a pain for me to review.
Hi Steven,
What kind of different filenames? .txt instead of .patch?
Its not all of your files only some come through with junk letters like this one has ¨s1* as the filename. Another one had the Eurosymbol Squared....it could just be gmail being goofy as I noticed some of the patches come through fine. -- Steven Edwards "There is one thing stronger than all the armies in the world, and that is an idea whose time has come." - Victor Hugo
Steven Edwards schreef:
Its not all of your files only some come through with junk letters like this one has
¨s1*
as the filename. Another one had the Eurosymbol Squared....it could just be gmail being goofy as I noticed some of the patches come through fine.
I haven't tried webmail of gmail, but gmail received through thunderbird works fine for me. Not sure why webmail would be any different then pop3. Cheers, Maarten
Am Samstag, 15. September 2007 18:11:43 schrieb Maarten Lankhorst:
Steven Edwards schreef:
Its not all of your files only some come through with junk letters like this one has
¨s1*
as the filename. Another one had the Eurosymbol Squared....it could just be gmail being goofy as I noticed some of the patches come through fine.
I haven't tried webmail of gmail, but gmail received through thunderbird works fine for me. Not sure why webmail would be any different then pop3. Working fine here too
On 9/15/07, Stefan Dösinger <stefandoesinger(a)gmx.at> wrote:
Am Samstag, 15. September 2007 18:11:43 schrieb Maarten Lankhorst:
Steven Edwards schreef:
Its not all of your files only some come through with junk letters like this one has
¨s1*
as the filename. Another one had the Eurosymbol Squared....it could just be gmail being goofy as I noticed some of the patches come through fine.
I haven't tried webmail of gmail, but gmail received through thunderbird works fine for me. Not sure why webmail would be any different then pop3. Working fine here too
It has to be the webmail of gmail then. I see it on gmail.
"Jesse Allen" <the3dfxdude(a)gmail.com> writes in gmane.comp.emulators.wine.devel:
On 9/15/07, Stefan Dösinger <stefandoesinger(a)gmx.at> wrote:
Am Samstag, 15. September 2007 18:11:43 schrieb Maarten Lankhorst:
Steven Edwards schreef:
Its not all of your files only some come through with junk letters like this one has
¨s1*
as the filename. Another one had the Eurosymbol Squared....it could just be gmail being goofy as I noticed some of the patches come through fine.
I haven't tried webmail of gmail, but gmail received through thunderbird works fine for me. Not sure why webmail would be any different then pop3. Working fine here too
It has to be the webmail of gmail then. I see it on gmail.
---------------- Content-Type: text/x-patch; name*0="0003-gdi-Implement-BiDi-classification-of-characters-and.patch" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; filename*0="0003-gdi-Implement-BiDi-classification-of-characters-and.pat"; filename*1="ch" ----------------- Looks like RFC 2231: "MIME Parameter Value and Encoded Word Extensions: Character Sets, Languages, and Continuations" Perhaps there is some bug in RFC 2231 parser on gmail. / Kari Hurtta
On 15/09/2007, Jesse Allen <the3dfxdude(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 9/15/07, Stefan Dösinger <stefandoesinger(a)gmx.at> wrote:
Am Samstag, 15. September 2007 18:11:43 schrieb Maarten Lankhorst:
Steven Edwards schreef:
Its not all of your files only some come through with junk letters like this one has
¨s1*
as the filename. Another one had the Eurosymbol Squared....it could just be gmail being goofy as I noticed some of the patches come through fine.
I haven't tried webmail of gmail, but gmail received through thunderbird works fine for me. Not sure why webmail would be any different then pop3. Working fine here too
It has to be the webmail of gmail then. I see it on gmail.
I'm seeing the filenames as being garbled here on gmail as well, so it does look like a gmail issue. I don't know about other webmail, though. If I select "Show original" from the "Reply" menu, I see: User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.13 (X11/20070824) which would explain why the people using Thunderbird can see it correctly. I also see: Content-Type: text/x-patch; name*0="0003-gdi-Implement-BiDi-classification-of-characters-and.patch" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; filename*0="0003-gdi-Implement-BiDi-classification-of-characters-and.pat"; filename*1="ch" So the name is fine. I'm wondering if it is the way that gmail is processing the Content-Disposition line. Do you want to file a bug report with Google, or should I do it? - Reece
Am Sonntag, 16. September 2007 11:27:17 schrieb Reece Dunn:
If I select "Show original" from the "Reply" menu, I see:
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.13 (X11/20070824)
which would explain why the people using Thunderbird can see it correctly. I also see: I'm using kmail here
On 9/16/07, Reece Dunn <msclrhd(a)googlemail.com> wrote:
Do you want to file a bug report with Google, or should I do it?
Please file it. Thanks -- Steven Edwards "There is one thing stronger than all the armies in the world, and that is an idea whose time has come." - Victor Hugo
On 16/09/2007, Steven Edwards <winehacker(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 9/16/07, Reece Dunn <msclrhd(a)googlemail.com> wrote:
Do you want to file a bug report with Google, or should I do it?
Please file it.
Done. http://groups.google.com/group/google-mail-problem-solving-uk/browse_thread/... - Reece
participants (6)
-
Jesse Allen -
Kari Hurtta -
Maarten Lankhorst -
Reece Dunn -
Stefan Dösinger -
Steven Edwards