Re: ntdll: Add a stub implementation for RtlDllShutdownInProgress.
Mike McCormack wrote:
+NTSTATUS WINAPI RtlDllShutdownInProgress(void) +{ + FIXME("\n"); + return STATUS_SUCCESS; +}
For undocumented functions like this, you should add a test case. -- Rob Shearman
Robert Shearman wrote:
+NTSTATUS WINAPI RtlDllShutdownInProgress(void)
For undocumented functions like this, you should add a test case.
That's unreasonable. A stub isn't meant to work correctly, just stop an application from crashing. What will a test case prove? Mike
Mike McCormack wrote:
Robert Shearman wrote:
+NTSTATUS WINAPI RtlDllShutdownInProgress(void)
For undocumented functions like this, you should add a test case.
That's unreasonable. A stub isn't meant to work correctly, just stop an application from crashing. What will a test case prove?
In this case, just that the prototype is correct and so won't crash the program in random ways when the function is called. -- Rob Shearman
Robert Shearman wrote:
In this case, just that the prototype is correct and so won't crash the program in random ways when the function is called.
Well, you're welcome to write such a test case if you think it's necessary. I think you'll prove nothing useful. Mike
participants (2)
-
Mike McCormack -
Robert Shearman