Re: Patch Tracker?

[James Mckenzie]

Austin English wrote:
> Sent: Nov 24, 2009 2:09 PM
> To: Nate Gallaher <ngallaher(a)deepthought.org>
> Cc: wine-devel(a)winehq.org
> Subject: Re: Patch Tracker?
>
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Nate Gallaher
> <ngallaher(a)deepthought.org> wrote:
> > There's a new patch tracker?
>
> http://source.winehq.org/patches/

Congratulations, Austin and Patch tracker team.

James McKenzie

Patch Tracker?

[Austin English]

On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 3:22 PM, James Mckenzie
<jjmckenzie51(a)earthlink.net> wrote:
> Austin English wrote:
> > Sent: Nov 24, 2009 2:09 PM
> > To: Nate Gallaher <ngallaher(a)deepthought.org>
> > Cc: wine-devel(a)winehq.org
> > Subject: Re: Patch Tracker?
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Nate Gallaher
> > <ngallaher(a)deepthought.org> wrote:
> > > There's a new patch tracker?
> >
> > http://source.winehq.org/patches/
>
> Congratulations, Austin and Patch tracker team.

I'm not involved, that was all Alexandre's doing.

-- 
-Austin

Patch Tracker?

[Jerome Leclanche]

Is it possible to ignore the Re:'s that don't have a patch attached?


J. Leclanche / Adys



On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 10:23 PM, Austin English
<austinenglish(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 3:22 PM, James Mckenzie
> <jjmckenzie51(a)earthlink.net> wrote:
> > Austin English wrote:
> > > Sent: Nov 24, 2009 2:09 PM
> > > To: Nate Gallaher <ngallaher(a)deepthought.org>
> > > Cc: wine-devel(a)winehq.org
> > > Subject: Re: Patch Tracker?
> > >
> > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Nate Gallaher
> > > <ngallaher(a)deepthought.org> wrote:
> > > > There's a new patch tracker?
> > >
> > > http://source.winehq.org/patches/
> >
> > Congratulations, Austin and Patch tracker team.
>
> I'm not involved, that was all Alexandre's doing.
>
> --
> -Austin

Patch Tracker?

[Jerome Leclanche]

Some people reply on wine-patches to comment on patches. Those are a
safe bet to ignore when no patch is detected. There are a few examples
on the page.


J. Leclanche / Adys



On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 3:37 PM, Nate Gallaher
<ngallaher(a)deepthought.org> wrote:
> I'm not sure what you're asking. Are you trying to ignore wine-devel threads
> that
> don't involve patches?
>
> ~Nate
>
> Jerome Leclanche wrote:
> > Is it possible to ignore the Re:'s that don't have a patch attached?
> >
> > J. Leclanche / Adys
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 10:23 PM, Austin English
> > <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 3:22 PM, James Mckenzie
> > > <jjmckenzie51(a)earthlink.net> wrote:
> > > > Austin English wrote:
> > > > > Sent: Nov 24, 2009 2:09 PM
> > > > > To: Nate Gallaher <ngallaher(a)deepthought.org>
> > > > > Cc: wine-devel(a)winehq.org
> > > > > Subject: Re: Patch Tracker?
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Nate Gallaher
> > > > > <ngallaher(a)deepthought.org> wrote:
> > > > > > There's a new patch tracker?
> > > > >
> > > > > http://source.winehq.org/patches/
> > > >
> > > > Congratulations, Austin and Patch tracker team.
> > >
> > > I'm not involved, that was all Alexandre's doing.
> > >
> > > --
> > > -Austin