Re: [PATCH v2 1/8] dlls/msvcrt: improve support for template in methods

[Marvin]

Hi,

It looks like your patch introduced the new failures shown below.
Please investigate and fix them before resubmitting your patch.
If they are not new, fixing them anyway would help a lot. Otherwise
please ask for the known failures list to be updated.

The full results can be found at:
https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=119463

Your paranoid android.


=== debian11 (32 bit report) ===

msvcrt:
cpp.c:1310: Test failed: 136: Got name "public: __cdecl foo<double>::operator <int>int(void) __ptr64"
cpp.c:1313: Test failed: 136: Expected "public: __cdecl foo<double>::operator<int> int(void) __ptr64"

=== debian11 (32 bit Arabic:Morocco report) ===

msvcrt:
cpp.c:1310: Test failed: 136: Got name "public: __cdecl foo<double>::operator <int>int(void) __ptr64"
cpp.c:1313: Test failed: 136: Expected "public: __cdecl foo<double>::operator<int> int(void) __ptr64"

=== debian11 (32 bit German report) ===

msvcrt:
cpp.c:1310: Test failed: 136: Got name "public: __cdecl foo<double>::operator <int>int(void) __ptr64"
cpp.c:1313: Test failed: 136: Expected "public: __cdecl foo<double>::operator<int> int(void) __ptr64"

=== debian11 (32 bit French report) ===

msvcrt:
cpp.c:1310: Test failed: 136: Got name "public: __cdecl foo<double>::operator <int>int(void) __ptr64"
cpp.c:1313: Test failed: 136: Expected "public: __cdecl foo<double>::operator<int> int(void) __ptr64"

=== debian11 (32 bit Hebrew:Israel report) ===

msvcrt:
cpp.c:1310: Test failed: 136: Got name "public: __cdecl foo<double>::operator <int>int(void) __ptr64"
cpp.c:1313: Test failed: 136: Expected "public: __cdecl foo<double>::operator<int> int(void) __ptr64"

=== debian11 (32 bit Hindi:India report) ===

msvcrt:
cpp.c:1310: Test failed: 136: Got name "public: __cdecl foo<double>::operator <int>int(void) __ptr64"
cpp.c:1313: Test failed: 136: Expected "public: __cdecl foo<double>::operator<int> int(void) __ptr64"

=== debian11 (32 bit Japanese:Japan report) ===

msvcrt:
cpp.c:1310: Test failed: 136: Got name "public: __cdecl foo<double>::operator <int>int(void) __ptr64"
cpp.c:1313: Test failed: 136: Expected "public: __cdecl foo<double>::operator<int> int(void) __ptr64"

=== debian11 (32 bit Chinese:China report) ===

msvcrt:
cpp.c:1310: Test failed: 136: Got name "public: __cdecl foo<double>::operator <int>int(void) __ptr64"
cpp.c:1313: Test failed: 136: Expected "public: __cdecl foo<double>::operator<int> int(void) __ptr64"

=== debian11 (32 bit WoW report) ===

msvcrt:
cpp.c:1310: Test failed: 136: Got name "public: __cdecl foo<double>::operator <int>int(void) __ptr64"
cpp.c:1313: Test failed: 136: Expected "public: __cdecl foo<double>::operator<int> int(void) __ptr64"

=== debian11 (64 bit WoW report) ===

msvcrt:
cpp.c:1310: Test failed: 136: Got name "public: __cdecl foo<double>::operator <int>int(void) __ptr64"
cpp.c:1313: Test failed: 136: Expected "public: __cdecl foo<double>::operator<int> int(void) __ptr64"