Re: Add explicit WM_CLOSE processing in the edit control
3 Mar
2001
3 Mar
'01
7:17 p.m.
Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)sloboda.ru> writes:
Since handler of WM_CLOSE in DefWindowProc calls DestroyWindow, which eventually sends WM_DESTROY, EDITSTATE gets destroyed before call to EDIT_UnlockBuffer in the end of processing of WM_CLOSE, therefore EDIT_UnlockBuffer gets confused.
This is not specific to WM_CLOSE, it can happen with other messages too; any time we transfer control back to the application the window can be destroyed. I think it would be better to either unlock the buffer before calling DefWindowProc, or make EDIT_UnlockBuffer cope with a destroyed window. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.com
9048
Age (days ago)
9048
Last active (days ago)
0 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
Alexandre Julliard