Re: Restructure WINE_WAVEOUT/WINE_WAVEIN
8 Jun
2005
8 Jun
'05
5:51 p.m.
Jeremy White <jwhite(a)codeweavers.com> writes:
@@ -228,12 +205,20 @@
/* DirectSound stuff */ DSDRIVERDESC ds_desc; - DSCDRIVERCAPS ds_caps; -} WINE_WAVEIN; + DSDRIVERCAPS ds_caps; + + union { + WINE_WAVEOUT out; + WINE_WAVEIN in; + };
You need to give a name to the union, anonymous unions are not portable. Though considering how few fields remain in the in/out structure you might just as well merge them into the common structure and use a single structure for everything. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org
7495
Age (days ago)
7495
Last active (days ago)
0 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
Alexandre Julliard