Re: [PATCH] vbscript: Implemented Oct(try 4)

[Marvin]

Hi,

While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=12481

Your paranoid android.


=== w2000pro (32 bit) ===
No test summary line found

=== wxppro (32 bit) ===
No test summary line found

=== w2003std (32 bit) ===
No test summary line found

=== wvistau64 (32 bit) ===
No test summary line found

=== w2008s64 (32 bit) ===
No test summary line found

=== w7u (32 bit) ===
No test summary line found

=== w8 (32 bit) ===
No test summary line found

=== wvistau64 (64 bit) ===
No test summary line found

=== w2008s64 (64 bit) ===
No test summary line found

[PATCH] vbscript: Implemented Oct(try 4)

[Shuai Meng]

Hi, anyone who  comment on this patch to improve it will be greatly
appreciated.

2015-03-28 17:50 GMT+08:00 Marvin <testbot(a)winehq.org>:
> Hi,
>
> While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
> Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
> wrong, but could you please double-check?
> Full results can be found at
> https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=12481
>
> Your paranoid android.
>
> === w2000pro (32 bit) ===
> No test summary line found
>
> === wxppro (32 bit) ===
> No test summary line found
>
> === w2003std (32 bit) ===
> No test summary line found
>
> === wvistau64 (32 bit) ===
> No test summary line found
>
> === w2008s64 (32 bit) ===
> No test summary line found
>
> === w7u (32 bit) ===
> No test summary line found
>
> === w8 (32 bit) ===
> No test summary line found
>
> === wvistau64 (64 bit) ===
> No test summary line found
>
> === w2008s64 (64 bit) ===
> No test summary line found

[PATCH] vbscript: Implemented Oct(try 4)

[Piotr Caban]

On 03/30/15 17:28, Shuai Meng wrote:
> Hi, anyone who  comment on this patch to improve it will be greatly
> appreciated.
> This patch also looks good for me.