[PATCH] gdi32/tests: Fix the spelling of an ok() message.
Signed-off-by: Francois Gouget <fgouget(a)free.fr> --- dlls/gdi32/tests/font.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/dlls/gdi32/tests/font.c b/dlls/gdi32/tests/font.c index d3ec971dce0..94910ff60fc 100644 --- a/dlls/gdi32/tests/font.c +++ b/dlls/gdi32/tests/font.c @@ -5862,7 +5862,7 @@ static void test_GetGlyphOutline_character(void) ok(ret != GDI_ERROR, "GetGlyphOutlineW failed for glyph index 0x3\n"); ret = GetGlyphOutlineW(hdc, 0xFFFF, GGO_METRICS|GGO_GLYPH_INDEX, &gm2, 0, NULL, &mat); - ok(ret == GDI_ERROR, "GetGlyphOutlineW for nonexistent glyph index 0xFFFF has succeded\n"); + ok(ret == GDI_ERROR, "GetGlyphOutlineW for nonexistent glyph index 0xFFFF has succeeded\n"); ret = GetGlyphOutlineW(hdc, 0x10003, GGO_METRICS|GGO_GLYPH_INDEX, &gm2, 0, NULL, &mat); ok(ret != GDI_ERROR, "GetGlyphOutlineW for index 0x10003 has failed\n"); -- 2.20.1
Hi, While running your changed tests, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at: https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=82450 Your paranoid android. === w10pro64_ar (64 bit report) === gdi32: font.c:1029: Test failed: Small Fonts(12): tm.tmFirstChar = 00 font.c:1035: Test failed: Small Fonts(12): tm.tmBreakChar = 00 font.c:1029: Test failed: Small Fonts(13): tm.tmFirstChar = 00 font.c:1035: Test failed: Small Fonts(13): tm.tmBreakChar = 00
participants (2)
-
Francois Gouget -
Marvin