Re: [final, sorry] msi: Expand IDL file to contain all OLE automation interfaces.
On 3/1/07, Misha Koshelev <mk144210(a)bcm.tmc.edu> wrote:
Ok, sorry about posting patches to uncomitted patches, I have reintegrated these changes back into my patches. The change in this patch is the IDL file now contains all OLE automation interfaces as of native installer version 3.0 (as opposed to 2.0).
As a reminder this is part 2 of 4 of my patchset:
1. http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2007-February/036359.html 2. This patch 3. Next patch 4. http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2007-February/036362.html
You need to resubmit the whole series if you resubmit parts of it. -- James Hawkins
On Thu, 2007-03-01 at 12:29 -0800, James Hawkins wrote:
On 3/1/07, Misha Koshelev <mk144210(a)bcm.tmc.edu> wrote:
Ok, sorry about posting patches to uncomitted patches, I have reintegrated these changes back into my patches. The change in this patch is the IDL file now contains all OLE automation interfaces as of native installer version 3.0 (as opposed to 2.0).
As a reminder this is part 2 of 4 of my patchset:
1. http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2007-February/036359.html 2. This patch 3. Next patch 4. http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2007-February/036362.html
You need to resubmit the whole series if you resubmit parts of it.
I feel bad crowding the wine-patches list with my posts and I sent Alexandre an email with the URLs to all four patches. Do you think I really need to send all four again? Misha 1. http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2007-February/036359.html 2. http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2007-March/036541.html 3. http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2007-March/036542.html 4. http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2007-February/036362.html
On 3/1/07, Misha Koshelev <mk144210(a)bcm.tmc.edu> wrote:
On Thu, 2007-03-01 at 12:29 -0800, James Hawkins wrote:
On 3/1/07, Misha Koshelev <mk144210(a)bcm.tmc.edu> wrote:
Ok, sorry about posting patches to uncomitted patches, I have reintegrated these changes back into my patches. The change in this patch is the IDL file now contains all OLE automation interfaces as of native installer version 3.0 (as opposed to 2.0).
As a reminder this is part 2 of 4 of my patchset:
1. http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2007-February/036359.html 2. This patch 3. Next patch 4. http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2007-February/036362.html
You need to resubmit the whole series if you resubmit parts of it.
I feel bad crowding the wine-patches list with my posts and I sent Alexandre an email with the URLs to all four patches. Do you think I really need to send all four again?
Misha
1. http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2007-February/036359.html 2. http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2007-March/036541.html 3. http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2007-March/036542.html 4. http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2007-February/036362.html
That's the way the submission process works. Also, you should append/prepend a [tryX], where X is the number of times you've tried to send this in before + 1, so we know exactly which patch emails are the most up to date. -- James Hawkins
On Thu, 2007-03-01 at 12:46 -0800, James Hawkins wrote:
On 3/1/07, Misha Koshelev <mk144210(a)bcm.tmc.edu> wrote:
On Thu, 2007-03-01 at 12:29 -0800, James Hawkins wrote:
On 3/1/07, Misha Koshelev <mk144210(a)bcm.tmc.edu> wrote:
Ok, sorry about posting patches to uncomitted patches, I have reintegrated these changes back into my patches. The change in this patch is the IDL file now contains all OLE automation interfaces as of native installer version 3.0 (as opposed to 2.0).
As a reminder this is part 2 of 4 of my patchset:
1. http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2007-February/036359.html 2. This patch 3. Next patch 4. http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2007-February/036362.html
You need to resubmit the whole series if you resubmit parts of it.
I feel bad crowding the wine-patches list with my posts and I sent Alexandre an email with the URLs to all four patches. Do you think I really need to send all four again?
Misha
1. http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2007-February/036359.html 2. http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2007-March/036541.html 3. http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2007-March/036542.html 4. http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2007-February/036362.html
That's the way the submission process works. Also, you should append/prepend a [tryX], where X is the number of times you've tried to send this in before + 1, so we know exactly which patch emails are the most up to date.
Ok, I resent them. Misha
participants (2)
-
James Hawkins -
Misha Koshelev