Re: [include/winternl.h #7] SYSTEM_PROCESS_INFORMATION

[Alexandre Julliard]

Paul Vriens <Paul.Vriens(a)xs4all.nl> writes:
> I removed the __WINESRC__ bit as it will never be used and it makes the
> (coming) tests look better (no private structure needed). 
> The Windows struct part in SYSTEM_PROCESS_INFORMATION is wrong anyway
> (both by size and members).

Actually in most cases the non __WINESRC__ case is the one you want to
keep, since it comes from the Microsoft headers. You can replace the
Reserved things with better names but you should keep at least the
fields that have explicit names in the MS headers. If you have to
change the layout more than that something is seriously wrong.

-- 
Alexandre Julliard
julliard(a)winehq.org

[include/winternl.h #7] SYSTEM_PROCESS_INFORMATION

[Paul Vriens]

On Mon, 2005-06-06 at 19:50, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Paul Vriens <Paul.Vriens(a)xs4all.nl> writes:
> > I removed the __WINESRC__ bit as it will never be used and it makes the
> > (coming) tests look better (no private structure needed). 
> > The Windows struct part in SYSTEM_PROCESS_INFORMATION is wrong anyway
> > (both by size and members).
>
> Actually in most cases the non __WINESRC__ case is the one you want to
> keep, since it comes from the Microsoft headers. You can replace the
> Reserved things with better names but you should keep at least the
> fields that have explicit names in the MS headers. If you have to
> change the layout more than that something is seriously wrong.

Ok,

The names for dwUnknown are not important enough to be changed right
now. I will wait with tha,t till I figured out what the dwUnknown's are.

Cheers,

Paul.