Re: winewrapper: In 64 bit trees the loader is called wine64.

[Alexandre Julliard]

Francois Gouget <fgouget(a)free.fr> writes:
> This fixes running 'make test' in 64 bit trees.

I don't mind adding this, but I would recommend running tests with a
proper WoW64 setup instead.

-- 
Alexandre Julliard
julliard(a)winehq.org

winewrapper: In 64 bit trees the loader is called wine64.

[Francois Gouget]

On Tue, 2 Sep 2014, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Francois Gouget <fgouget(a)free.fr> writes:
> > This fixes running 'make test' in 64 bit trees.
>
> I don't mind adding this, but I would recommend running tests with a
> proper WoW64 setup instead.

Given that it's possible to do a 64 bit build of Wine I think 'make 
test' should work in that build (or more specifically cd 
dlls/mshtml/tests && make events.ok in my case).

Now as far as WineTest is concerned I run both the 32 and 64 bit 
WineTest in a WoW64 setup (it's the -wow32 and -wow64 results 
respectively). Do you feel that the pure 64 bit results (-t64) are of no 
value and that it's not worth running them?


-- 
Francois Gouget <fgouget(a)free.fr>              http://fgouget.free.fr/
 The greatest programming project of all took six days; on the seventh day the
  programmer rested. We've been trying to debug the *&^%$#@ thing ever since.
                      Moral: design before you implement.

winewrapper: In 64 bit trees the loader is called wine64.

[Alexandre Julliard]

Francois Gouget <fgouget(a)free.fr> writes:
> Now as far as WineTest is concerned I run both the 32 and 64 bit 
> WineTest in a WoW64 setup (it's the -wow32 and -wow64 results 
> respectively). Do you feel that the pure 64 bit results (-t64) are of no 
> value and that it's not worth running them?

I don't think it's worth it, no. The results should be mostly identical,
but in the cases where they differ, that's because pure 64-bit is not a
supported setup so it's not something we would be interested in fixing.

-- 
Alexandre Julliard
julliard(a)winehq.org