Re: USER32: Patch 1 of 6: Fix returned value of LB_DIR
On 11/10/07, Alex Villacís Lasso <a_villacis(a)palosanto.com> wrote:
Tests reveal that (on an unsorted listbox), LB_DIR returns the value of the highest index inserted, as if it had sorted the list of files before starting the insertion. This patch attempts to replicate this behavior.
Changelog: * Make LB_DIR return an index value as if it had inserted filenames in sorted order.
Tests? Tests that aren't in the test suite that should be to verify the patch is correct? -- James Hawkins
On 11/10/07, James Hawkins <truiken(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 11/10/07, Alex Villacís Lasso <a_villacis(a)palosanto.com> wrote:
Tests reveal that (on an unsorted listbox), LB_DIR returns the value of the highest index inserted, as if it had sorted the list of files before starting the insertion. This patch attempts to replicate this behavior.
Changelog: * Make LB_DIR return an index value as if it had inserted filenames in sorted order.
Tests? Tests that aren't in the test suite that should be to verify the patch is correct?
I'll go ahead and eat this one :) -- James Hawkins
participants (1)
-
James Hawkins