too many functions in msvcrt20.dll?

[Chipzz]

I was looking at porting a small subset of msvcrt80.dll, and so I took a
look at msvcrt20.dll.

I first used a disassembler to get a list of the functions in the native
windows dll, ran a script over that, and then ran another script over
msvcrt20.spec.

Much to my surprise, the wine implementation has more(!!) functions than
the native dll. So, I was wondering, this screws up the index of these
functions in the list, right? Does that index actually matter?

The diff between the 2 files is attached.

With kr,

Chipzz AKA
Jan Van Buggenhout
-- 

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 UNIX isn't dead - It just smells funny
                           Chipzz(a)ULYSSIS.Org
------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Baldric, you wouldn't recognize a subtle plan if it painted itself pur-
 ple and danced naked on a harpsicord singing 'subtle plans are here a-
 gain'."

[Alexandre Julliard]

Chipzz <chipzz(a)ULYSSIS.Org> writes:
> Much to my surprise, the wine implementation has more(!!) functions than
> the native dll. So, I was wondering, this screws up the index of these
> functions in the list, right? Does that index actually matter?

No, the index doesn't matter, the functions are looked up by name, so
it's mostly a cosmetic issue; but it should probably still be fixed.

-- 
Alexandre Julliard
julliard(a)winehq.org