Re: [PATCH 1/2] secur32: Improved error handling in schan_DecryptMessage.
14 Sep
2010
14 Sep
'10
1:53 p.m.
On 14 September 2010 20:27, Piotr Caban <piotr(a)codeweavers.com> wrote:
+ else if (ret == GNUTLS_E_DECRYPTION_FAILED) ... + return SEC_E_MESSAGE_ALTERED; Are those really the same?
14 Sep
14 Sep
2:59 p.m.
New subject: [PATCH 1/2] secur32: Improved error handling in schan_DecryptMessage.
Hi, On 09/14/10 20:53, Henri Verbeet wrote:
On 14 September 2010 20:27, Piotr Caban<piotr(a)codeweavers.com> wrote:
+ else if (ret == GNUTLS_E_DECRYPTION_FAILED) ... + return SEC_E_MESSAGE_ALTERED; Are those really the same? This is not exactly the same, but it should work in most cases.
5658
Age (days ago)
5658
Last active (days ago)
1 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Henri Verbeet -
Piotr Caban