Warren, On Mac OS X/Darwin .so and .dylib extensions are both used. In fact .dylib extension is used for dynamic libraries (libwine*.dylib) whereas dll.so and exe.so extensions are used for the dlls and the exe. So your patch would break winegcc on Mac OS X. Pierre.
Pierre d'Herbemont <stegefin(a)free.fr> wrote on 10/10/2004 01:50:39 PM:
Warren,
On Mac OS X/Darwin .so and .dylib extensions are both used. In fact .dylib extension is used for dynamic libraries (libwine*.dylib) whereas dll.so and exe.so extensions are used for the dlls and the exe. So your patch would break winegcc on Mac OS X.'
Hi Pierre, Thanks for the info - I didn't realize how that worked on the mac. I've redone my changes so that SHLIBSUFFIX and EXESUFFIX stay .so and .exe.so on MacOSX, and I've left the special cases for .dylib in place. Let me know if you think this looks more reasonable. I've attached my re-worked patch. Warren -- Warren Baird, Technical Group Leader warren_baird(a)cimmetry.com Cimmetry System Inc. 514 735 3219 x148
Selon Warren_Baird/CSI(a)cimmetry.com:
Pierre d'Herbemont <stegefin(a)free.fr> wrote on 10/10/2004 01:50:39 PM:
Warren,
On Mac OS X/Darwin .so and .dylib extensions are both used. In fact .dylib extension is used for dynamic libraries (libwine*.dylib) whereas dll.so and exe.so extensions are used for the dlls and the exe. So your patch would break winegcc on Mac OS X.'
Hi Pierre,
Thanks for the info - I didn't realize how that worked on the mac. I've redone my changes so that SHLIBSUFFIX and EXESUFFIX stay .so and .exe.so on MacOSX, and I've left the special cases for .dylib in place. Let me know if you think this looks more reasonable.
I've attached my re-worked patch.
Looks good for me, although I won't be able to test it on Mac OS X/Darwin for a while. Pierre
participants (3)
-
Pierre d'Herbemont -
stegefin＠free.fr
-
Warren_Baird/CSI＠cimmetry.com