MSVCRT - __unDNameEx

[Andrei Barbu]

Hey,

I encountered an app that heavily relies on __unDNameEx which is a stub,
and I couldn't find any MSDN info on it.

The stub did have a hint as to an implementation of it, said that it's
been implemented pretty well in tools/winebuild/msmangle.c I looked for
that, couldn't find it, but I did find it in the CVS attic in
wine/tools/speckmaker 

http://cvs.winehq.com/cvsweb/~checkout~/wine/tools/specmaker/Attic/msmangle....

Is there a reason this isn't used there? or can I clean it up a little
and include it? Yes it does have some fixme's, but it's better than
ignoring it.



Thanks,
Andrei

[Dimitrie O. Paun]

On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 11:33:24AM -0400, Andrei Barbu wrote:
> Is there a reason this isn't used there? or can I clean it up a little
> and include it? Yes it does have some fixme's, but it's better than
> ignoring it.

I can't see why not.

-- 
Dimi.

[Rein Klazes]

On Mon, 21 Jun 2004 11:33:24 -0400, you wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I encountered an app that heavily relies on __unDNameEx which is a stub,
> and I couldn't find any MSDN info on it.
>
> The stub did have a hint as to an implementation of it, said that it's
> been implemented pretty well in tools/winebuild/msmangle.c

I guess that is a typo, and it should be tools/winedump/msmangle.c

Rein.
-- 
Rein Klazes
rklazes(a)xs4all.nl

[Eric Pouech]

Andrei Barbu a écrit :
> Hey,
>
> I encountered an app that heavily relies on __unDNameEx which is a stub,
> and I couldn't find any MSDN info on it.
>
> The stub did have a hint as to an implementation of it, said that it's
> been implemented pretty well in tools/winebuild/msmangle.c I looked for
> that, couldn't find it, but I did find it in the CVS attic in
> wine/tools/speckmaker
>
> http://cvs.winehq.com/cvsweb/~checkout~/wine/tools/specmaker/Attic/msmangle....
>
> Is there a reason this isn't used there? or can I clean it up a little
> and include it? Yes it does have some fixme's, but it's better than
> ignoring it.
>
> Thanks,
> Andrei
> the winedump implementation of demangling is rather buggy (and it isn't 
> actually fully demangling, it's spitting out C raw equivalents to the 
> C++ methods). I'm working on a better implementation that should be 
> available rather soon.
> A+