Re: [setupapi/tests] Fix a failure on Windows 2000

[James Hawkins]

On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 10:03 AM, Paul Vriens
<paul.vriens.wine(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> W2K doesn't fail with ERROR_INVALID_NAME but with ERROR_GENERAL_SYNTAX
> (setupapi
> error).

That error was added for a reason; it was seen on a win2k box.  Please
don't remove it.

-- 
James Hawkins

[setupapi/tests] Fix a failure on Windows 2000

[Paul Vriens]

On Sep 10, 2008, at 22:11, "James Hawkins" <truiken(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 10:03 AM, Paul Vriens
> <paul.vriens.wine(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > W2K doesn't fail with ERROR_INVALID_NAME but with  
> > ERROR_GENERAL_SYNTAX
> > (setupapi
> > error).
>
> That error was added for a reason; it was seen on a win2k box.  Please
> don't remove it.
>
> -- 
> James Hawkins
> I checked all w2k tests from the last 30 runs and they all came back  
> with that same error.

Cheers,

Paul

[setupapi/tests] Fix a failure on Windows 2000

[Paul Vriens]

James Hawkins wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 10:03 AM, Paul Vriens
> <paul.vriens.wine(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > W2K doesn't fail with ERROR_INVALID_NAME but with ERROR_GENERAL_SYNTAX
> > (setupapi
> > error).
>
> That error was added for a reason; it was seen on a win2k box.  Please
> don't remove it.

Ok, don't apply my patch.

The strange thing is that W2K appears to use 2 different failures but also on 
the same system!? (I checked the current data and the old-data on 
tests.winehq.org for this). FWIW, I even saw some W2K boxes return 
ERROR_FILE_NOT_FOUND.

I'll sent another one but will wait till after your other setupapi patch is applied.

-- 
Cheers,

Paul.