Defining COM interfaces without IDL
15 Mar
2007
15 Mar
'07
5:53 p.m.
Hi. The PSDK headers sometimes use IDL to define an interface, sometimes it's done by hand (or rather using macros). I don't know if there is any reason for that (someone in the channel said it's just sloppiness by MS) - so, are there any resulting differences regarding source compatibility or can we just use IDL even if MS didn't? Felix
6852
Age (days ago)
6852
Last active (days ago)
0 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
Felix Nawothnig