Re: [PATCH 3/5] d3drm/tests: Add refcount tests for IDirect3DRMFrame*. (v2)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Am 2016-06-15 um 10:35 schrieb Aaryaman Vasishta:
+ ok(ref1 == ref2, "Expected ref1 == ref2, got ref1 = %u, ref2 = %u.\n", ref1, ref2); + ok(ref2 == ref3, "Expected ref2 == ref3, got ref2 = %u, ref3 = %u.\n", ref2, ref3); + ok(ref1 == ref3, "Expected ref1 == ref3, got ref1 = %u, ref3 = %u.\n", ref1, ref3); I think you can assume basic logic still applies to d3drm :-) . There's no need to test ref1 == ref3 after you made sure (ref1 == ref2 && ref2 == ref3) .
More importantly though, patch 5 somewhat suggests that you're planning to have a full-blown QI and refcounting test for frames too. If that's the case there's no need to add this patch. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJXYcYrAAoJEN0/YqbEcdMwudEP/1BMGtCEhuN9i8BbphtECIuF otKTT8qBR1LFP0QocHWntJtCteJ69vq70dfxp764++wqt7UWuGrZhPdKG+6Qjb1u 9kBU6PppQNX4V0tybDgCMIEOv4HcY00FuCN4ahPu5bfBFOskXwOhzs2ne3bYHX1v iDR2NIATu2wwTkA/s/ttj5ZYuKflSl5EUC8wELFwy6IjonaICfuubvgZCVEDBc+R POeJbGbbvn/7v9Q+mfTLNDFvTdDANgTCFkIFmBxrPu2b4erFtRJQV47DVhaLGmZg BwOxV8AYnq7yEltiOkpWKgUtIC4q6U1pf7tW2uUm/4kPMM3+RviiFbX2fNKTFP6f 5rW/5xIP68ymv+Z4su24BbbMcYJPBXkHNkyk1bdARmXtTtzRQbSchdVCLCaOs81k Vmwbl7A4ZqqshTqv40DTRAQq5NWYFcvTbXdUkWZav9EtO9a0hs8PMO9GqG+RBgOu lGk9GrW/jvoWXx/knMtSuoHpkLnpPy4RuJefzVyw1NaawBfakTuUElD0/nnC2f+j 528Ft8FKM9wmJLf3v8fl4IB0vsnExkjOrbKRdWJAuvpxuZJp0rkSdXE0JrEEum44 BlgKzwWvFDl46BX/OC0pzvGlZ6417c/5JgaaPCXus9nGBPBaJx44d2QJWD/UELMS jN9KRUNfGyfcNYS4yVH1 =2nxr -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
participants (1)
-
Stefan Dösinger