[usp10] Add ScriptItemize, ScriptShape and ScriptPlace functionality

[Jeff L]

Is there anything wrong with this patch?  It does not seem to have been 
applied.

Jeff L

[usp10] Add ScriptItemize, ScriptShape and ScriptPlace functionality

[Stefan Leichter]

Am Freitag, 10. Februar 2006 12:51 schrieb Jeff L:
> Is there anything wrong with this patch?  It does not seem to have been
> applied.

from http://www.winehq.org/site/sending_patches

| Rejected patches might receive a note in the wine-devel mailing list,
| however they also may be silently dropped. If you receive no response to
| your patch don't give up! Try checking it against the above points, asking
| for guidance on wine-devel if you find no obvious issue, and resubmitting
| it.

Its sometimes hard to get a patch in, at least if you are not a "core" 
developer. Me think wine looses at least 2 patches / week because the sender 
don't care to get them in.

Bye Stefan

[usp10] Add ScriptItemize, ScriptShape and ScriptPlace functionality

[Tom Wickline]

On 2/11/06, Stefan Leichter <Stefan.Leichter(a)camline.com> wrote:
> Am Freitag, 10. Februar 2006 12:51 schrieb Jeff L:
> > Is there anything wrong with this patch?  It does not seem to have been
> > applied.
>
> from http://www.winehq.org/site/sending_patches
>
> | Rejected patches might receive a note in the wine-devel mailing list,
> | however they also may be silently dropped. If you receive no response to
> | your patch don't give up! Try checking it against the above points, asking
> | for guidance on wine-devel if you find no obvious issue, and resubmitting
> | it.

Side note:

Should we add to the above page something to the effect of, make sure
your indentation is consistent with what has been used in the file
that your editing?

Ive seen a number of cases where people have used different
indentation and it has caused problems with getting a patch accepted.

Tom
> Its sometimes hard to get a patch in, at least if you are not a "core"
> developer. Me think wine looses at least 2 patches / week because the sender
> don't care to get them in.
>
> Bye Stefan

[usp10] Add ScriptItemize, ScriptShape and ScriptPlace functionality

[Tony Lambregts]

Tom Wickline wrote:
> On 2/11/06, Stefan Leichter <Stefan.Leichter(a)camline.com> wrote:
> > Am Freitag, 10. Februar 2006 12:51 schrieb Jeff L:
> > > Is there anything wrong with this patch?  It does not seem to have been
> > > applied.
> >
> > from http://www.winehq.org/site/sending_patches
> >
> > | Rejected patches might receive a note in the wine-devel mailing list,
> > | however they also may be silently dropped. If you receive no response to
> > | your patch don't give up! Try checking it against the above points, asking
> > | for guidance on wine-devel if you find no obvious issue, and resubmitting
> > | it.
> > Its sometimes hard to get a patch in, at least if you are not a "core"
> > developer. Me think wine looses at least 2 patches / week because the sender
> > don't care to get them in.
>
> Side note:
>
> Should we add to the above page something to the effect of, make sure
> your indentation is consistent with what has been used in the file
> that your editing?
>
> Ive seen a number of cases where people have used different
> indentation and it has caused problems with getting a patch accepted.

Probably either there or here 
http://www.winehq.org/site/docs/winedev-guide/style-notes

or both..

Tony Lambregts