[PATCH 2/6] server: Use monotonic clock for relative timeouts.

[Piotr Caban]

Signed-off-by: Piotr Caban <piotr(a)codeweavers.com>
---
  server/fd.c         | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
  server/file.h       |  6 +++++
  server/protocol.def |  3 +++
  server/request.c    | 14 ++++++------
  server/request.h    |  8 ++++++-
  5 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

[Alexandre Julliard]

Piotr Caban <piotr(a)codeweavers.com> writes:
> @@ -214,6 +214,9 @@ struct wake_up_reply
>  typedef __int64 timeout_t;
>  #define TIMEOUT_INFINITE (((timeout_t)0x7fffffff) << 32 | 0xffffffff)
>
> +/* absolute timeout, negative means that monotonic clock is used */
> +typedef __int64 when_t;

It's not clear that 'when' would mean absolute timeout. I'd suggest
naming it something like abstime_t instead.

-- 
Alexandre Julliard
julliard(a)winehq.org