Re: (no subject)

[Dmitry Timoshkov]

"Tom" twickline(a)sitestar.net wrote:
> I changed the format to reflect the other version.rc files
> +#define WINE_PRODUCTNAME_STR "winsock"

You don't need to invent a product name, it's already defined in
include/wine/wine_common_ver.rc. The product name is Wine.

-- 
Dmitry.

(no subject)

[Tom]

On Sun, 21 Nov 2004 00:27:46 +0800, Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)baikal.ru> 
wrote:
> "Tom" twickline(a)sitestar.net wrote:
> > I changed the format to reflect the other version.rc files
> > +#define WINE_PRODUCTNAME_STR "winsock"
>
> You don't need to invent a product name, it's already defined in
> include/wine/wine_common_ver.rc. The product name is Wine.

Thanks,

So should we remove the DirectX product name from the DirectX .rc files or 
just leave it as is ?

Tom

(no subject)

[Dmitry Timoshkov]

"Tom" <twickline(a)sitestar.net> wrote:
> So should we remove the DirectX product name from the DirectX .rc files or 
> just leave it as is ?

I think it's up to DirectX maintainers, although I personally would prefer
to use "Wine" as the product name everywhere without exceptions. After all
that's a reason of include/wine/wine_common_ver.rc.

-- 
Dmitry.