Re: d3d9/tests: Limit the back buffer to 800x600 in the scissor size test.

[Francois Gouget]

On Thu, 12 Mar 2009, Michael Stefaniuc wrote:
> Most netbooks have only a 1024x600 display size and a 1024x768 back
> buffer fails on those. See
> http://test.winehq.org/data/ae1802d01ba2ec12a51ffb450dc7810d03809fe9/wine_ms...

Maybe the test should check the screen size and skip the test if it is 
too small... (as a preventive mesure in case a PC has an even smaller 
screen)


-- 
Francois Gouget <fgouget(a)free.fr>              http://fgouget.free.fr/
        A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.

d3d9/tests: Limit the back buffer to 800x600 in the scissor size test.

[Michael Stefaniuc]

Francois Gouget wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Mar 2009, Michael Stefaniuc wrote:
> > Most netbooks have only a 1024x600 display size and a 1024x768 back
> > buffer fails on those. See
> > http://test.winehq.org/data/ae1802d01ba2ec12a51ffb450dc7810d03809fe9/wine_ms...
>
> Maybe the test should check the screen size and skip the test if it is 
> too small... (as a preventive mesure in case a PC has an even smaller 
> screen)
> I sent the patch out to provoke a better patch from somebody more
> knowledgeable in that domain. Of course only if it's worth the effort;
> until the advent of the netbooks with their odd screen size assuming
> that 1024x768 will just work was good enough.

bye
	michael

d3d9/tests: Limit the back buffer to 800x600 in the scissor size test.

[Henri Verbeet]

2009/3/12 Michael Stefaniuc <mstefani(a)redhat.com>:
> I sent the patch out to provoke a better patch from somebody more
> knowledgeable in that domain. Of course only if it's worth the effort;
> until the advent of the netbooks with their odd screen size assuming
> that 1024x768 will just work was good enough.

My EeePC only does 800x640. IIRC test_reset() is affected by a similar
problem, in that it assumes 800x600 is available. I can probably write
a patch that just uses two different screen sizes from the list of
available ones.

d3d9/tests: Limit the back buffer to 800x600 in the scissor size test.

[Rico Schüller]

Henri Verbeet schrieb:
> 2009/3/12 Michael Stefaniuc <mstefani(a)redhat.com>:
> > I sent the patch out to provoke a better patch from somebody more
> > knowledgeable in that domain. Of course only if it's worth the effort;
> > until the advent of the netbooks with their odd screen size assuming
> > that 1024x768 will just work was good enough.
>
> My EeePC only does 800x640. IIRC test_reset() is affected by a similar
> problem, in that it assumes 800x600 is available. I can probably write
> a patch that just uses two different screen sizes from the list of
> available ones.

The resolution was a known problem when I made the test, but which 
resolution would be the best? Is there a solution which fits all 
platforms? Probably we should only skip the full screen tests, on 
machines which doesn't support such a resolution, which I guess were 
failing?

Probably next time someone is trying to run wine on his mobile phone 
with a resolution like 128x160 ...

Cheers
Rico