Re: [PATCH v2] comctl32/tests: Add tests for mouse right-click in a treeview control
On 16.05.2017 12:05, Hugh McMaster wrote:
Signed-off-by: Hugh McMaster <hugh.mcmaster(a)outlook.com> --- dlls/comctl32/tests/treeview.c | 79 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 79 insertions(+)
diff --git a/dlls/comctl32/tests/treeview.c b/dlls/comctl32/tests/treeview.c index 43de61c..ca3366d 100644 --- a/dlls/comctl32/tests/treeview.c +++ b/dlls/comctl32/tests/treeview.c @@ -54,6 +54,21 @@ static BOOL g_v6; static struct msg_sequence *sequences[NUM_MSG_SEQUENCES]; static struct msg_sequence *item_sequence[1];
+static void flush_events(void) +{ + MSG msg; + int diff = 200; + int min_timeout = 100; + DWORD time = GetTickCount() + diff; + + while (diff > 0) + { + if (MsgWaitForMultipleObjects(0, NULL, FALSE, min_timeout, QS_ALLINPUT) == WAIT_TIMEOUT) break; + while (PeekMessageA(&msg, 0, 0, 0, PM_REMOVE)) DispatchMessageA(&msg); + diff = time - GetTickCount(); + } +} + static const struct message FillRootSeq[] = { { TVM_INSERTITEMA, sent }, { TVM_INSERTITEMA, sent }, @@ -201,6 +216,13 @@ static const struct message test_get_set_unicodeformat_seq[] = { { 0 } };
+static const struct message test_right_click_seq[] = { + { WM_RBUTTONDOWN, sent|wparam, MK_RBUTTON }, + { WM_CAPTURECHANGED, sent|defwinproc }, + { TVM_GETNEXTITEM, sent|wparam|lparam|defwinproc, TVGN_CARET, 0 }, + { 0 } +}; + static const struct message parent_expand_seq[] = { { WM_NOTIFY, sent|id, 0, 0, TVN_ITEMEXPANDINGA }, { WM_NOTIFY, sent|id, 0, 0, TVN_ITEMEXPANDEDA }, @@ -342,6 +364,12 @@ static const struct message parent_vk_return_seq[] = { { 0 } };
+static const struct message parent_right_click_seq[] = { + { WM_NOTIFY, sent|id, 0, 0, NM_RCLICK }, + { WM_CONTEXTMENU, sent }, + { 0 } +}; + static HWND hMainWnd;
static HTREEITEM hRoot, hChild; @@ -1296,6 +1324,13 @@ static LRESULT CALLBACK parent_wnd_proc(HWND hWnd, UINT message, WPARAM wParam, } break; } + case NM_RCLICK: + { + HTREEITEM selected = (HTREEITEM)SendMessageA(((NMHDR *)lParam)->hwndFrom, + TVM_GETNEXTITEM, TVGN_CARET, 0); + ok(selected == hChild, "child item should still be selected\n"); + break; + } } } break; @@ -2583,6 +2618,49 @@ todo_wine DestroyWindow(hwnd); }
+static void test_right_click(void) +{ + HWND hTree; + HTREEITEM selected; + RECT rc; + LRESULT result; + POINT pt; + + hTree = create_treeview_control(0); + fill_tree(hTree); + + SendMessageA(hTree, TVM_ENSUREVISIBLE, 0, (LPARAM)hChild); + SendMessageA(hTree, TVM_SELECTITEM, TVGN_CARET, (LPARAM)hChild); + selected = (HTREEITEM)SendMessageA(hTree, TVM_GETNEXTITEM, TVGN_CARET, 0); + ok(selected == hChild, "child item not selected\n"); + + *(HTREEITEM *)&rc = hRoot; + result = SendMessageA(hTree, TVM_GETITEMRECT, TRUE, (LPARAM)&rc); + ok(result, "TVM_GETITEMRECT failed\n"); + + flush_events(); + + pt.x = rc.left + (rc.right - rc.left) / 2; + pt.y = rc.top + (rc.bottom - rc.top) / 2;
Could you please simplify this to "(a + b) / 2"? Other than that, it looks good.
participants (1)
-
Nikolay Sivov