re: Correction to crash inside RtlCaptureStackBackTrace() + test case

[Dan Kegel]

Hi Janne,
I haven't reviewed your code, but I can suggest sending each
patch as a separate message to wine-patches, and using titles more like
  ntdll: test corrupt stack frame in RtlCaptureStackBackTrace()
  ntdll: handle corrupt stack frame in RtlCaptureStackBackTrace()
and mention clearly that this fixes the online store in Anarchy Online
(if it does).

Also, please send the test patch by itself through winebot before posting
and verify that it passes on all flavors of windows.

See http://wiki.winehq.org/SubmittingPatches

Thanks!

Correction to crash inside RtlCaptureStackBackTrace() + test case

[Janne Hakonen]

Thanks for quick response!
> First i see is that your mail application wrapped the patch ( that is when 
> long likes brake down into the next line ).
> Then you have a whitespace issue in the makefile i think...
> Looks like my mailer (Windows Live Mail) thinks that if attachment has .txt 
> extension it is ok to do line wrapping and changing EOLs to CR LF. I 
> couldn't find an option to turn this feature off, but sending patches with 
> .patch extensions seems to prevent this formatting.
> > I created a new signal.c file for the test case under ntdll/tests since 
> > I couldn’t find more fitting place.
> > Not a good idea. Please put the test into rtl.c
> > Ok, I will do that.
> Please put ok() check inside get_back_trace_with_invalid_frame_pointer().
> Hmm, good point, I wonder why I didn't check the result -variable instead...
> I will change it as you proposed.
> Please use HeapAlloc/HeapFree. Don't cast void pointers. Here you don't 
> need
> to allocate anything, just use a stack variable.
> True, using stack is easier, I don't know why I tried to do it the hard way.
> Also you not checking the return value from RtlCaptureStackBackTrace().
> Please do.
> The function returns number of frames it could get. I don't know what kind 
> of value should be checked here since RtlCaptureStackBackTrace() is 
> implemented only on i386 architecture. The test would fail on other 
> architectures like arm, powerpc, x86_64 and sparc.
> Also, please send the test patch by itself through winebot before posting
> and verify that it passes on all flavors of windows.
> Ok, I will try it out when I have fixed the test case.

Thanks,
Janne Hakonen