Re: [3/5] urlmon: Implemented canonicalization for ports in URIs
Thomas Mullaly <thomas.mullaly(a)gmail.com> writes:
--- dlls/urlmon/uri.c | 88 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 files changed, 86 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
It doesn't work here: ../../../tools/runtest -q -P wine -M urlmon.dll -T ../../.. -p urlmon_test.exe.so uri.c && touch uri.ok uri.c:2788: Test failed: Error: Expected a length of 0 but got -2 on uri_tests[13].str_props[6]. make: *** [uri.ok] Error 1 -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 8:14 AM, Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org>wrote:
Thomas Mullaly <thomas.mullaly(a)gmail.com> writes:
--- dlls/urlmon/uri.c | 88 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 files changed, 86 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
It doesn't work here:
../../../tools/runtest -q -P wine -M urlmon.dll -T ../../.. -p urlmon_test.exe.so uri.c && touch uri.ok uri.c:2788: Test failed: Error: Expected a length of 0 but got -2 on uri_tests[13].str_props[6]. make: *** [uri.ok] Error 1
Hmm... that's weird. The patch didn't change any of the test cases nor did it even change any of the implementations that it's now failing on. I would like to ask if you could ignore the whole patch set until I figure out what's going on, since the bug might have been introduced earlier in the set. Thanks. -- Thomas Mullaly thomas.mullaly(a)gmail.com
participants (2)
-
Alexandre Julliard -
Thomas Mullaly