Re: [PATCH 3/3] mshtml: Added support for accessing select options by index.

Hi,

While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=1828

Your paranoid android.


=== W98SE (32 bit) ===
No test summary line found

=== W2KPROSP4 (32 bit) ===
No test summary line found

=== WXPPROSP3 (32 bit) ===
No test summary line found

=== W2K3R2SESP2 (32 bit) ===
No test summary line found

=== WVISTAADM (32 bit) ===
No test summary line found

=== W2K8SE (32 bit) ===
No test summary line found

=== W7PRO (32 bit) ===
No test summary line found

=== W7PROX64 (32 bit) ===
No test summary line found

=== W7PROX64 (64 bit) ===
No test summary line found

[PATCH 3/3] mshtml: Added support for accessing select options by index.

[Paul Vriens]

On 04/29/2010 06:54 PM,  (Marvin) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
> Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
> wrong, but could you please double-check?
> Full results can be found at
> http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=1828
>
> Your paranoid android.
>
> === W98SE (32 bit) ===
> No test summary line found
>
> === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit) ===
> No test summary line found
>
> === WXPPROSP3 (32 bit) ===
> No test summary line found
>
> === W2K3R2SESP2 (32 bit) ===
> No test summary line found
>
> === WVISTAADM (32 bit) ===
> No test summary line found
>
> === W2K8SE (32 bit) ===
> No test summary line found
>
> === W7PRO (32 bit) ===
> No test summary line found
>
> === W7PROX64 (32 bit) ===
> No test summary line found
>
> === W7PROX64 (64 bit) ===
> No test summary line found

They all show:

mshtml: start - -
Usage: C:\winetest\mshtml_test.exe test_name

Valid test names:
     dom
     events
     htmldoc
     htmllocation
     misc
     protocol
     script
mshtml: done (1)

The only file changed in this patch is jstest.html but that one doesn't 
have a corresponding test executable. If jstest.html changes, the 
testbot should actually run the script test.

-- 
Cheers,

Paul.