Re: [PATCH] ws2_32: Fix the default behavior of IPV6_V6ONLY

[Marvin]

Hi,

While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=26345

Your paranoid android.


=== w2008s64 (64 bit sock) ===
sock: unhandled exception c0000005 at 000007FEFF126F94

[PATCH] ws2_32: Fix the default behavior of IPV6_V6ONLY

[Bruno Jesus]

On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 10:37 PM, Marvin <testbot(a)winehq.org> wrote:
> === w2008s64 (64 bit sock) ===
> sock: unhandled exception c0000005 at 000007FEFF126F94

Unfortunately a well-known issue. Clean run
https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=26344

I just started wondering if there is a difference between testing the
patches manually and letting Marvin test them, because it is quite
common for people to send a reference to a "clean run" whenever Marvin
sends such emails.

[PATCH] ws2_32: Fix the default behavior of IPV6_V6ONLY

[Roman Pišl]

Hi,
patch 127122 is also superseded by your patch. Thank you for commiting!

Best,
Roman

---------- Původní zpráva ----------
Od: Bruno Jesus 
Komu: Wine Develop 
Datum: 30. 10. 2016 2:28:32
Předmět: Re: [PATCH] ws2_32: Fix the default behavior of IPV6_V6ONLY

On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 10:37 PM, Marvin  wrote:
> === w2008s64 (64 bit sock) ===
> sock: unhandled exception c0000005 at 000007FEFF126F94

Unfortunately a well-known issue. Clean run
https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=26344

I just started wondering if there is a difference between testing the
patches manually and letting Marvin test them, because it is quite
common for people to send a reference to a "clean run" whenever Marvin
sends such emails.